Hi guix, it seems that our emacs-jedi package does not work out of the box. According to the docs[fn:1], it needs jediepcserver.py, which is available in the repo [fn:2], but we do not install it. Anybody is using the package? Thanks, Nicolò #+name: missing-py-file #+begin_src shell find $(guix build emacs-jedi) #+end_src #+RESULTS: | /gnu/store/h19y68slc2sx5j2m2pnrnnjqd05pa7ph-emacs-jedi-0.2.8 | | /gnu/store/h19y68slc2sx5j2m2pnrnnjqd05pa7ph-emacs-jedi-0.2.8/share | | /gnu/store/h19y68slc2sx5j2m2pnrnnjqd05pa7ph-emacs-jedi-0.2.8/share/emacs | | /gnu/store/h19y68slc2sx5j2m2pnrnnjqd05pa7ph-emacs-jedi-0.2.8/share/emacs/site-lisp | | /gnu/store/h19y68slc2sx5j2m2pnrnnjqd05pa7ph-emacs-jedi-0.2.8/share/emacs/site-lisp/jedi-autoloads.el | | /gnu/store/h19y68slc2sx5j2m2pnrnnjqd05pa7ph-emacs-jedi-0.2.8/share/emacs/site-lisp/jedi-autoloads.elc | | /gnu/store/h19y68slc2sx5j2m2pnrnnjqd05pa7ph-emacs-jedi-0.2.8/share/emacs/site-lisp/jedi-core.el | | /gnu/store/h19y68slc2sx5j2m2pnrnnjqd05pa7ph-emacs-jedi-0.2.8/share/emacs/site-lisp/jedi-core.elc | | /gnu/store/h19y68slc2sx5j2m2pnrnnjqd05pa7ph-emacs-jedi-0.2.8/share/emacs/site-lisp/jedi.el | | /gnu/store/h19y68slc2sx5j2m2pnrnnjqd05pa7ph-emacs-jedi-0.2.8/share/emacs/site-lisp/jedi.elc | | /gnu/store/h19y68slc2sx5j2m2pnrnnjqd05pa7ph-emacs-jedi-0.2.8/share/emacs/site-lisp/test-jedi.el | | /gnu/store/h19y68slc2sx5j2m2pnrnnjqd05pa7ph-emacs-jedi-0.2.8/share/emacs/site-lisp/test-jedi.elc | | /gnu/store/h19y68slc2sx5j2m2pnrnnjqd05pa7ph-emacs-jedi-0.2.8/share/emacs/site-lisp/tryout-jedi.el | | /gnu/store/h19y68slc2sx5j2m2pnrnnjqd05pa7ph-emacs-jedi-0.2.8/share/emacs/site-lisp/tryout-jedi.elc | [fn:1] https://tkf.github.io/emacs-jedi/latest/#manual-pyinstall [fn:2] https://github.com/tkf/emacs-jedi/blob/master/jediepcserver.py
Hi,
Nicolò Balzarotti <anothersms@gmail.com> writes:
> Hi guix,
>
> it seems that our emacs-jedi package does not work out of the box.
> According to the docs[fn:1], it needs jediepcserver.py, which is available
> in the repo [fn:2], but we do not install it. Anybody is using the package?
This was fixed in 299be00adb427441c0cb7d301bf918594f61400e.
Closing.
Thanks for the report!
Maxim