From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp2 ([2001:41d0:8:6d80::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id yGciL0o0RmDvFwAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 08 Mar 2021 14:27:22 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:8:6d80::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp2 with LMTPS id 6NmBKko0RmCgCAAAB5/wlQ (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 08 Mar 2021 14:27:22 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 170ED2C37A for ; Mon, 8 Mar 2021 15:27:22 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost ([::1]:52606 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lJGqv-0006VS-65 for larch@yhetil.org; Mon, 08 Mar 2021 09:27:21 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:35030) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lJGqc-0006Th-3L for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Mar 2021 09:27:03 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:59159) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lJGqb-00086G-Sb for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Mar 2021 09:27:01 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lJGqb-000361-Nl for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Mar 2021 09:27:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#46905: Add a note about ext4's dir_index to the manual Resent-From: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 08 Mar 2021 14:27:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 46905 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice Received: via spool by 46905-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B46905.161521361411888 (code B ref 46905); Mon, 08 Mar 2021 14:27:01 +0000 Received: (at 46905) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Mar 2021 14:26:54 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42472 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lJGqU-00035f-Em for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 08 Mar 2021 09:26:54 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:45314) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lJGqT-00035U-AD for 46905@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 08 Mar 2021 09:26:53 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:48477) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lJGqO-000817-4S; Mon, 08 Mar 2021 09:26:48 -0500 Received: from [2a01:e0a:1d:7270:af76:b9b:ca24:c465] (port=41086 helo=ribbon) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1lJGqN-0003P9-JE; Mon, 08 Mar 2021 09:26:47 -0500 From: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= References: <87v9a89c8v.fsf@nckx> <87blbymvd5.fsf@gnu.org> <87v9a6zgs1.fsf@nckx> X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: 18 =?UTF-8?Q?Vent=C3=B4se?= an 229 de la =?UTF-8?Q?R=C3=A9volution?= X-PGP-Key-ID: 0x090B11993D9AEBB5 X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 3CE4 6455 8A84 FDC6 9DB4 0CFB 090B 1199 3D9A EBB5 X-OS: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu Date: Mon, 08 Mar 2021 15:26:46 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87v9a6zgs1.fsf@nckx> (Tobias Geerinckx-Rice's message of "Thu, 04 Mar 2021 23:38:06 +0100") Message-ID: <87r1kpbu1l.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-guix@gnu.org List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: 46905@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1615213642; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding:resent-cc: resent-from:resent-sender:resent-message-id:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post; bh=FGqolEpRYPye7dfMnIrW9EwHF7gcTmGKb7JxpWFqGag=; b=fjK4n/WEZIJxT8qIrZ6YSGcBzXVgsxNl6kTLWPwEXkizHNXo29IFDYu/e939cUeCdQtVtN 715Jtov8Q1JY3MeiZ6slQT5BnVfh2QRgAbjY2pxgDKaOGAzdlfQ52ppn2nI/pE+O7oY8hr omfEpf92IBEjEzz8wg1Roz5tvpD60dZoCMld6eyzk2V5jCoZd+Whq/ZCekj5HuHUUFaZhi 3mRC3RmHzYbTGYXeMOfAsphRJF6SstbKRn2KnClu6U8YyISveE+DP5o2SFQnzLtlA+b9Ym K7LIJuIIKs098uEpcYFHVn24xe6KvpkLODhuWJU2j5ctxsYjj/u7N5U2QUbUCQ== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1615213642; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=g8u0VchkJkCCgCBqUqNNzesvH+h8z+VyB50gL2xVRHpt6mg8pb9Kk43NznxMGR9qDuwOTR oTwONJTGbT0xribMyAvYCIAQkgEDavm0i6eOzpw1jtjK8D6Z4ut8YdR8pB+8GUGrJcfEz0 WTcQClsXEIoXa682+3riW/36i7D758s3D4OuqMsuCoT/IBiiBpZ2yO6JFx16IIJI2eYbwH 6zM38k6OzsjV6j0tlsdINWQTBWxOuqkNC3iua162V4+XATQ65NfpVSTdIskg3Yc0/EqVPV ChKT9gD0RzKGxTrbeMFFqMFmO8PR5RTgFIdghPGTUMeg6Tz5q0XSRjAQHyRGWQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -2.88 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gnu.org; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 170ED2C37A X-Spam-Score: -2.88 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn0.migadu.com X-TUID: hVUmBXlvpm8N Hi, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice skribis: > I should note that later in the IRC convo I corrected my sloppy =E2=80=98= full=E2=80=99 > to =E2=80=98hash collision=E2=80=99. Unfortunately it just returns an al= ready > overloaded -ENOSPC to user space. OK, but when do we get ENOSPC, then? > Ludovic Court=C3=A8s =E5=86=99=E9=81=93=EF=BC=9A [...] >> I don=E2=80=99t think we can claim there=E2=80=99s a design flaw. WDYT? > > Fine; implementation flaw, then? Problem is, it's not like there are > other implementations than the one we're stuck with, so it matters > little what we call it. My point is that we shouldn=E2=80=99t suggest that ext4 + dir_index is flaw= ed or unsuitable for Guix use, because we have strong evidence suggesting otherwise. :-) Now, I agree that if there are bugs or limitations hit in some situations, we should document (or fix) them. WDYT? Thanks, Ludo=E2=80=99.