From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp2 ([2001:41d0:2:bcc0::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms0.migadu.com with LMTPS id oWBzAJAcrGBkuQAAgWs5BA (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 24 May 2021 23:37:20 +0200 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:bcc0::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp2 with LMTPS id 2NwsN48crGAmXgAAB5/wlQ (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 24 May 2021 21:37:19 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 40FDE25D65 for ; Mon, 24 May 2021 23:37:19 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost ([::1]:45808 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1llIGE-0002fD-BU for larch@yhetil.org; Mon, 24 May 2021 17:37:18 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:49504) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1llIFz-0002aJ-My for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 24 May 2021 17:37:03 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:60742) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1llIFy-0006BX-S2 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 24 May 2021 17:37:03 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1llIFy-00019e-Pc for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 24 May 2021 17:37:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#47823: Hardenize Guix website TLS/DNS Resent-From: Marius Bakke Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 24 May 2021 21:37:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 47823 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Julien Lepiller , Leo Famulari , bo0od Received: via spool by 47823-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B47823.16218922164407 (code B ref 47823); Mon, 24 May 2021 21:37:02 +0000 Received: (at 47823) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 May 2021 21:36:56 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44051 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1llIFn-00018q-Qm for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 24 May 2021 17:36:55 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:55712) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1llIFm-00018e-De for 47823@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 24 May 2021 17:36:50 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:51718) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1llIFf-0005zv-PI; Mon, 24 May 2021 17:36:43 -0400 Received: from host-37-191-231-185.lynet.no ([37.191.231.185]:58694 helo=localhost) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1llIFf-0002PF-DL; Mon, 24 May 2021 17:36:43 -0400 From: Marius Bakke In-Reply-To: <4BF8EE8A-C2B4-429A-A0DF-928155A5802E@lepiller.eu> References: <4BF8EE8A-C2B4-429A-A0DF-928155A5802E@lepiller.eu> Date: Mon, 24 May 2021 23:36:40 +0200 Message-ID: <87r1hvq0ev.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-guix@gnu.org List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: 47823@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1621892239; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:resent-cc:resent-from:resent-sender: resent-message-id:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references: list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-post; bh=wuVzSExWzBJimrL6s0ff8tU2euyQJOj1br61ghTvxPQ=; b=WuSTw5LovH5zSd+a/k2SftkWkl49B6Ct+EK/ve7yOSYX4x9ugpIVHkGoZXuD4UPajUray6 oXEYHF7er0yLE7yeJ6j87cy5EVxVj+4E3rgJKnM8tMPK1opQV38l6ES7pL3FoyfZU9/V7a dSlvOUakQNhF+xbOryQkMd9VmqP7WpS3VuBs07B1WGynJedmfODHvrC2IyY2Yp38Xdf6Gg /kNUaUsFbFltujGc33nskr2YAt8X4oabgwbJXk575ipGuWKND5U9hAwP9x8poPKoWMCEDJ UvDIk9BRiuBLQ7uv9O7e4/pGRurwvWDqHEa1Rvfc1So3akYqp2GNNSST2zpZgQ== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1621892239; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=IBXnsQQieIcV5NYNrSqeXNJ1uMlbKN5c9hc9LS0x8IHPgjQ8Sl/rnV/6niee0zRGvCI9R8 pl0q+pn8X2GbCWpMEKjib511HQlX2wc4rQht/3WhQtqTc6i/yPfPEmoPy/XXBNTjVIhXG0 yItwYONY5hGjlhFXTulOm8sBaHbXHuwLC36v4AVlrIGtH0aH02/WsbKUqlGpNthShK35aw 8x+gIQzOYppNBFOBhaYIKMloBqBPNwwbwHBKjYSW5E3/QYycSUk0a5n6XEAqhAlysJ3p3F 1qKCQLkfVq76ECPcoeh2pigNyLn3DG0zMsLC421eDBfuv/3gmIusA+12BOTUzQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -5.03 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gnu.org; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 40FDE25D65 X-Spam-Score: -5.03 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn1.migadu.com X-TUID: EK/sXGuj6agg --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Julien Lepiller skriver: > Le 16 avril 2021 12:15:25 GMT-04:00, Leo Famulari a = =C3=A9crit : >>On Fri, Apr 16, 2021 at 11:00:05AM +0000, bo0od wrote: >>> Scanning Guix website gave many missing security features which >>modern >>> security needs them to be available: >>>=20 >>> * TLS and DNS: >>>=20 >>> looking at: >>>=20 >>> https://www.hardenize.com/report/guix.gnu.org/1618568751 >>>=20 >>> https://www.ssllabs.com/ssltest/analyze.html?d=3Dguix.gnu.org >> >>Thanks! >> >>> - DNS: DNSSEC support missing (important) >> >>Hm, is it important? My impression is that it's an idea whose time has >>passed without significant adoption. >> >>But maybe we could enable it if the costs are not too great. > > gnu.org does not have dnssec, so we'd need them to work on that first. gnu.org used to have DNSSEC, but disabled it because it gave NXDOMAIN on machines with systemd-resolved: https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/9867 --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iIUEARYKAC0WIQRNTknu3zbaMQ2ddzTocYulkRQQdwUCYKwcaA8cbWFyaXVzQGdu dS5vcmcACgkQ6HGLpZEUEHenCwD/YYtd/o1YGwYU8ijFa3autZLJ7AqrJmnIMkQK eU1B3ycBAJfslNfCrF48/WIFUOfQZcIhkXoLWvm2YOB5s5qWljwA =2vKi -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--