From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=)
Subject: Re: To-do lists
Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2013 14:22:15 +0100
Message-ID: <87pq0pcuig.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <1358958375.20780@bluehome.net> <871udbv81f.fsf@gnu.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:40860)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1TzofJ-0003kE-2D
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 28 Jan 2013 08:22:26 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1TzofB-0006Sz-4w
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 28 Jan 2013 08:22:24 -0500
Received: from mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr ([192.134.164.82]:15205)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>)
	id 1TzofA-0006Sp-Vr
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 28 Jan 2013 08:22:17 -0500
In-Reply-To: <871udbv81f.fsf@gnu.org> ("Ludovic
	\=\?utf-8\?Q\?Court\=C3\=A8s\=22'\?\=
	\=\?utf-8\?Q\?s\?\= message of "Wed, 23 Jan 2013 23:39:08 +0100")
List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix <bug-guix.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/bug-guix>,
	<mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-guix>
List-Post: <mailto:bug-guix@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-guix>,
	<mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: bug-guix@gnu.org

ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Court=C3=A8s) skribis:

> "Jason Self" <jason@bluehome.net> skribis:
>
>> Another option might be GNU Recutils.
>
> Right.
>
>> Regardless of the use of Org-mode or Recutils, is there any reason
>> such a file couldn't exist in version control on Savannah? It could be
>> part of either the source code repository or web pages repository.
>> Access would be easily controlled using the existing mechanisms on
>> Savannah, with anonymous access for anyone to view it as well.
>
> Yes.  This only thing is that I wouldn=E2=80=99t want to clutter the sour=
ce
> repository history with these things, so we definitely need a separate
> repo.
>
> It could be the web repo, but that=E2=80=99s the CVS, so we may well lose=
 our
> temper.  ;-)
>
> Perhaps we should ask savannah-hackers for a secondary Git repo?

Done at <https://savannah.gnu.org/support/?108240>.

Ludo=E2=80=99.