From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=)
Subject: Re: New =?utf-8?B?4oCcZ3VpeCBwdWxs4oCd?= command
Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2013 21:28:10 +0100
Message-ID: <87ppzs855x.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <87r4kak2yj.fsf@gnu.org> <201302212034.05033.andreas@enge.fr>
	<87r4k8ifil.fsf@gnu.org> <201302221759.37819.andreas@enge.fr>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:41727)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1U8zEJ-0002uN-SB
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Feb 2013 15:28:33 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1U8zEE-0001Dz-6U
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Feb 2013 15:28:27 -0500
Received: from [2a01:e0b:1:123:ca0a:a9ff:fe03:271e] (port=41173
	helo=xanadu.aquilenet.fr) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1U8zEE-0001CL-0S
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Feb 2013 15:28:22 -0500
In-Reply-To: <201302221759.37819.andreas@enge.fr> (Andreas Enge's message of
	"Fri, 22 Feb 2013 17:59:37 +0100")
List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix <bug-guix.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/bug-guix>,
	<mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-guix>
List-Post: <mailto:bug-guix@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-guix>,
	<mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Andreas Enge <andreas@enge.fr>
Cc: bug-guix@gnu.org

Andreas Enge <andreas@enge.fr> skribis:

> Am Freitag, 22. Februar 2013 schrieb Ludovic Court=C3=A8s:
>> Can you run
>>   guix build /nix/store/7pp5x6b3ikz6vnvrdlr836bjp4sbgbg8-guix-latest.drv
>> and post the log?
>
> Unpacking og guix-0.2, then:

[...]

>    ?: 3 [module-variable #<directory (guix build download) 3243e10> make-
> session]
> In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
> 2732: 2 [b #<autoload (gnutls) 350b870> make-session #f]
> In unknown file:
>    ?: 1 [scm-error misc-error #f ...]
> In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
>  106: 0 [#<procedure 2a4e280 at ice-9/boot-9.scm:97:6 (thrown-k . args)>=
=20
> misc-error ...]
>
> ice-9/boot-9.scm:106:20: In procedure #<procedure 2a4e280 at=20
> ice-9/boot-9.scm:97:6 (thrown-k . args)>:
> ice-9/boot-9.scm:106:20: missing interface for module (gnutls)

I believe this is fixed by 7b50c68 (which is like 855a8ad).
Can you confirm?

(Note how the file system introduces non-determinism in a way that can
have a concrete effect: the bug above would show up only if
guix/build/download.scm wasn=E2=80=99t built when guix/scripts/download.scm=
 was
compiled, which depends on the order in which files were traversed.)

Ludo=E2=80=99.