From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Subject: bug#22402: info guix pages Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2016 11:45:09 +0100 Message-ID: <87powxc0ga.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20160119014714.GA13864@jasmine> <87a8o2djsu.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55110) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aLTna-0002VL-Ve for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Jan 2016 05:46:07 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aLTnW-0002Ad-0a for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Jan 2016 05:46:06 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:36962) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aLTnV-0002AW-Tp for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Jan 2016 05:46:01 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aLTnV-0007Lt-NK for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Jan 2016 05:46:01 -0500 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: In-Reply-To: (carl hansen's message of "Tue, 19 Jan 2016 01:34:46 -0800") List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: carl hansen Cc: 22402@debbugs.gnu.org carl hansen skribis: > Yes, that is the case, there is no mystery, there is indeed a > /root/.guix-profile/share/info/guix.info > and there is NOT a > ~user/.guix-profile/share/info/guix.info OK. > However I consider that a bug. Here I am a user, using guix, and I expect > "info guix" to work. Why would the user have to switch to root just to re= ad > this one info file? After installing guix, I would expect guix.info to be > in my defalt .guix-profile, or a least a notice of how to install > guix.info. ( coping and linking I know how to do, that's not the problem. > It's a question > of creating a polished piece of software.) Yeah, I agree this is bad. On GuixSD there=E2=80=99s no such problem becau= se Guix is installed system-wide, so =E2=80=9Cinfo guix=E2=80=9D always picks = up the system-wide guix.info at least. > Would "guix package -i guix" do the right thing? That seems all > wrong, would install stuff I already have. It would do the trick, yes. I=E2=80=99m not sure how to fix that problem on foreign distros. Suggestio= ns welcome. Ludo=E2=80=99.