From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Subject: bug#24105: git package misses man pages Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2016 11:33:54 +0200 Message-ID: <87pop7u4cd.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20160729124623.GA31006@solar> <20160729171059.GA14354@jasmine> <87vaznb5my.fsf@gnu.org> <20160809190302.GA13796@jasmine> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53856) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bZxEb-00031E-1B for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Aug 2016 05:34:05 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bZxEX-0001un-QW for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Aug 2016 05:34:02 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:33810) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bZxEX-0001uX-Ne for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Aug 2016 05:34:01 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bZxEX-0008Bt-JU for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Aug 2016 05:34:01 -0400 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20160809190302.GA13796@jasmine> (Leo Famulari's message of "Tue, 9 Aug 2016 15:03:02 -0400") List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: Leo Famulari Cc: 24105@debbugs.gnu.org Leo Famulari skribis: > On Sat, Jul 30, 2016 at 03:46:29PM +0200, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote: >> Leo Famulari skribis: >>=20 >> > On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 02:46:23PM +0200, Andreas Enge wrote: >>=20 >> [...] >>=20 >> >> I suggest to include the man pages into the git package itself. If bu= ilding >> >> them is a real issue, adding a source and the build phase of git-manp= ages >> >> to the git package itself could also be an option. >> > >> > I agree. If we continue to not build them from source, it won't make t= he >> > Git package any more "expensive". We could add the pre-built source >> > tarball as a native-input to the Git package, and re-use the unpack >> > phase from git-manpages. >>=20 >> I agree too, this sounds like a good idea. > > I've attached a patch. Your thoughts? > > From 2407216eac19e5a7a3376efc497f7047dc0c8299 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Leo Famulari > Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2016 14:55:37 -0400 > Subject: [PATCH] gnu: git: Provide man-pages in main Git package. > > * gnu/packages/version-control.scm (git-manpages): Remove variable. > (git)[native-inputs]: Add GIT-MANPAGES. > [arguments]: Add 'install-man-pages' phase. LGTM! :-) Thank you! Ludo'.