From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Subject: bug#25882: gcc-wrapper doesn't handle response files Date: Thu, 25 May 2017 14:42:32 +0200 Message-ID: <87poexxg3r.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87o9xepe7l.fsf@gnu.org> <871suajpfh.fsf@lupo.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <87r329fjcq.fsf@gnu.org> <878togudsp.fsf@lupo.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <87shmk6i2t.fsf@gnu.org> <871su2sp4l.fsf@lupo.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51429) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dDs6b-0001LL-HN for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 25 May 2017 08:43:06 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dDs6Y-0003YF-Fw for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 25 May 2017 08:43:05 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:34373) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dDs6Y-0003Xs-CC for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 25 May 2017 08:43:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dDs6Y-000543-6U for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 25 May 2017 08:43:02 -0400 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-To: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <871su2sp4l.fsf@lupo.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> (Federico Beffa's message of "Sun, 12 Mar 2017 12:36:42 +0100") List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: Federico Beffa Cc: 25882-done@debbugs.gnu.org Hi Federico, Federico Beffa skribis: > ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Court=C3=A8s) writes: > >> The attached version adds handling of unreadable files and recursion. >> It does not address parsing of quote-delimited options though, but I=E2= =80=99m >> tempted to punt on that one. > > My worry is that not handling them may lead to hard to debug, guix > specific errors. Since we=E2=80=99re about to freeze =E2=80=98core-updates=E2=80=99 and I=E2= =80=99d like to make progress on this front, I pushed the ld-wrapper change as commit 696487d665a616dfdd09272a7bff0bea0e19375d. It=E2=80=99s not perfect as discussed earlier, but it=E2=80=99s known to be= =E2=80=9Cgood enough=E2=80=9D with GHC and Chromium, which are the only users of this I k= now of. Thanks, Ludo=E2=80=99.