From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Marius Bakke Subject: bug#27003: [PATCH 0/3] Generalized wrap phase for perl, python. Date: Tue, 30 May 2017 17:17:55 +0200 Message-ID: <87poeqe5lo.fsf@fastmail.com> References: <20170520093742.2115-1-alex@pompo.co> <87pof35lc6.fsf@fastmail.com> <873a2319.AEEALFrChFQAAAAAAAAAAAPFd4YAAAACwQwAAAAAAAW9WABZKyA9@mailjet.com> <87h90322vn.fsf@pompo.co> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40002) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dFiuM-0002I8-RK for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 30 May 2017 11:18:07 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dFiuI-0000rp-Rq for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 30 May 2017 11:18:06 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:42763) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dFiuI-0000rl-Nq for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 30 May 2017 11:18:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dFiuI-0000Vp-Ia for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 30 May 2017 11:18:02 -0400 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: In-Reply-To: List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: Arun Isaac , alex@pompo.co Cc: 27003@debbugs.gnu.org --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Arun Isaac writes: >> I cannot currently make guarantees on when I'll be able to wrap my head >> around the entire problem, so if you come to conclusions for next steps >> on the basis of your testing, we should go with those. >> >> Else I will revisit this issue when I have time (which might be a >> while). > > I don't have any ideas on how to fix this. And, I don't understand Guix > internals very well. So, I'll wait for you or someone else to come up > with a solution. But, I can help with testing patches. I'm not sure if #25235 should block this issue though, since it's a useful change regardless. But, not handling it adds "technical debt", and a (minor) problem that is not currently present in perl modules. We do have until the next 'core-updates' to think about it though ;-) --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCgAdFiEEu7At3yzq9qgNHeZDoqBt8qM6VPoFAlktjSMACgkQoqBt8qM6 VPprvAf/YnXs7TMTLKDriiK83gB5E4rMtFa6dKKk8kVl2YtIAIqBZRtCQ3LtN03o jPrkBMoz037M+wy96xRFtmXtt0zHfyW6ajImJ1+sFLhv1rNC2+XYYBk5dV8mmlfv AgP+tDlBFVWn8rNtKwEkkwPSqippjVR4TMb9wNjx5QsAQJMc5a7pFmoiUDt+yhfI 1iw/CBe8ueTr0AQcXk4WOfF401nYB2gfjM/hcjnWQInKtp/12ee9MmKPRAm2ut7N 3U8K38xO0lsTO5pGqVn5zIq+v0Y9QW3Hk4C9m02a2OHQHQJDuGA4KVb89GaDfokx 1wM7segtBH3Hlt69C1ihiK+sik1xPA== =uRLK -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--