From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=)
Subject: bug#27437: Source downloader accepts X.509 certificate for incorrect
	domain
Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2017 11:31:40 +0200
Message-ID: <87podvaw3n.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <20170621061752.GA32412@jasmine.lan> <87lgolipi0.fsf@gnu.org>
	<87injohwac.fsf@netris.org> <20170622161108.GA15580@jasmine.lan>
	<87wp83rg4k.fsf@gnu.org> <87y3sj7cqx.fsf@gnu.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47121)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1dOKwg-0001Au-SO
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Jun 2017 05:32:07 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1dOKwb-0001mt-Sn
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Jun 2017 05:32:06 -0400
Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:59430)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)
	(Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1dOKwb-0001mp-PH
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Jun 2017 05:32:01 -0400
Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1dOKwb-0002Do-K1
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Jun 2017 05:32:01 -0400
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.27437.B27437.14982103168528@debbugs.gnu.org>
In-Reply-To: <87y3sj7cqx.fsf@gnu.org> (Mike Gerwitz's message of "Thu, 22 Jun
	2017 20:45:42 -0400")
List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix <bug-guix.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/bug-guix>,
	<mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-guix/>
List-Post: <mailto:bug-guix@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-guix>,
	<mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "bug-Guix" <bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Mike Gerwitz <mtg@gnu.org>
Cc: 27437@debbugs.gnu.org

Mike Gerwitz <mtg@gnu.org> skribis:

> On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 21:12:27 +0200, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote:
>> I think only GNU and kernel.org provide signatures, which represents 6%
>> of our packages.  Of the 30% that do not have an updater, surely some
>> have digital signatures, but we=E2=80=99re probably still below 10%.  The
>> situation is bad in general=E2=80=A6
>
> What about signed tags/commits?

They=E2=80=99re becoming more widespread, especially now that GitHub=E2=80=
=99s UI can
make sense of them.  Nevertheless, I don=E2=80=99t think it changes the rat=
io
much if we look at the whole package set that we have.

Ludo=E2=80=99.