From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alex Kost Subject: bug#30434: magit =?UTF-8?Q?won=E2=80=99t?= work over TRAMP Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2018 22:38:56 +0300 Message-ID: <87po56avqn.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87lgfyl67x.fsf@elephly.net> <87mv0e2jvm.fsf@gmail.com> <876072koq0.fsf@elephly.net> <87wozgosxx.fsf@netris.org> <871shny0a1.fsf@gmail.com> <877erfph9m.fsf@netris.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53398) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1emPO1-00005d-MW for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 15 Feb 2018 14:40:06 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1emPNy-0005uu-Ip for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 15 Feb 2018 14:40:05 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:37235) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1emPNy-0005uo-Dk for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 15 Feb 2018 14:40:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1emPNy-0005UV-6V for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 15 Feb 2018 14:40:02 -0500 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <877erfph9m.fsf@netris.org> (Mark H. Weaver's message of "Wed, 14 Feb 2018 13:17:57 -0500") List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: Mark H Weaver Cc: 30434@debbugs.gnu.org Mark H Weaver (2018-02-14 13:17 -0500) wrote: > Hi Alex, > > Alex Kost writes: > >> Mark H Weaver (2018-02-14 03:51 -0500) wrote: >> >>> Ricardo Wurmus writes: >>>> I think it makes sense *not* to hardcode the path to the git executable >>>> here. >>> >>> Agreed. Done, in commit 5fe9ba59ba1cea12a70d011aacbace52e3bfda18 on >>> master and commit 317e8e9404058af35d9843e076934560f95d895a on >>> core-updates. I'm closing this bug now. >> >> You didn't remove "git" from the inputs. I think it is not needed now. > > I removed it on my first attempt, but the build failed. See below. Oh, right, sorry. I use my own package for magit and it dosn't require git input, so I thought that the original guix package also doesn't need it. Sorry for the confusion :-) -- Alex