From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ricardo Wurmus Subject: bug#33586: "updating substitutes" spam Date: Tue, 04 Dec 2018 08:00:30 +0100 Message-ID: <87pnuhhj3l.fsf@elephly.net> References: <87k1ksgjnm.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:57585) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gU4sX-0005x0-SM for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Dec 2018 02:12:24 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gU4ha-0007Hh-6C for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Dec 2018 02:01:07 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:55470) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gU4hZ-0007Gr-W4 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Dec 2018 02:01:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gU4hZ-0001SF-Pd for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Dec 2018 02:01:01 -0500 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: In-reply-to: <87k1ksgjnm.fsf@gmail.com> List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: Taylan Kammer Cc: 33586@debbugs.gnu.org Taylan Kammer writes: > A minor issue, but I wanted to create a bug-report for this to make > sure it's on the radar. > > During updates, guix may print this message hundreds of times: > > substitute: updating substitutes from 'http://...' 100% > > Repetitions of this message should probably be coalesced into a single > message. Each of these messages is for a different substitute query. We are currently not showing the query, so it looks like the same work is done multiple times. The substitute queries are executed at different times. Coalescing the messages would mean that the messages for previous queries are delayed until the last query is performed. This would not be good. I don=E2=80=99t know if we can reorder the queries so that they all happen = at once. -- Ricardo