From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Maxim Cournoyer Subject: bug#31868: Test failure for GnuCash 3.3 (previously 3.0) Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2019 17:33:04 -0500 Message-ID: <87pntepu5b.fsf@apteryx.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> References: <87a7rurxoa.fsf@gmail.com> <87zhskdtiq.fsf@gmail.com> <20190102074558.GA23211@macbook41> <8736qbfpkp.fsf@elephly.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:57763) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gep5X-0006ft-NO for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Jan 2019 17:34:12 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gep5R-0001Gz-OK for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Jan 2019 17:34:09 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:37759) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gep5O-0001FT-EA for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Jan 2019 17:34:03 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gep5O-0007Mw-9U for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Jan 2019 17:34:02 -0500 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-To: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <8736qbfpkp.fsf@elephly.net> (Ricardo Wurmus's message of "Wed, 02 Jan 2019 09:09:42 +0100") List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: Ricardo Wurmus Cc: Maxim Cournoyer , 31868-done@debbugs.gnu.org Ricardo Wurmus writes: > Efraim Flashner writes: > >> On Tue, Jan 01, 2019 at 03:15:09PM -0500, Maxim Cournoyer wrote: >>> Using latest Guix, GnuCash 3.3 fails its test suite by only one test: >>>=20 >>> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- >>> [fail] line:644, test: dual amount column, first transaction correct >>> transaction.scm/display options >>> -> expected: ("01/03/18" "$103 income" "Root.Asset.Bank" "$103.00" "$1= 03.00") >>> -> obtained: ("01/03/19" "$103 income" "Root.Asset.Bank" "$103.00" "$1= 03.00") >>> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- >>>=20 >> >> Haven't looked at the test yet, is this a 'yyyy' vs 'YYYY' error in ISO8= 601? > > To me this looks like the test assumes that we=E2=80=99re running it in 2= 018, > not $current_year. Good flair; it turned out to be exactly this. Fixed with commit 707efe171a4e0e542a7d969c130195fa94b5d615. Closing. Thank you, Maxim