From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Jan Nieuwenhuizen <janneke@gnu.org>
Subject: bug#36747: Official MesCC bootstrap binaries differ from my locally
 built ones
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2019 19:41:06 +0200
Message-ID: <87pnm2ufv1.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <875znwcoo9.fsf@netris.org> <87ef2j1pgt.fsf@gnu.org>
 <87ftmy51kk.fsf@netris.org> <87muh6sib4.fsf@gnu.org>
 <877e8a79mz.fsf@netris.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:55479)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1hpcKL-0002BW-MU
 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Jul 2019 13:42:22 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1hpcKA-0007xX-69
 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Jul 2019 13:42:14 -0400
Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:53002)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)
 (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>)
 id 1hpcK3-0007vB-1W
 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Jul 2019 13:42:05 -0400
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.36747.B36747.156381728019273@debbugs.gnu.org>
In-Reply-To: <877e8a79mz.fsf@netris.org> (Mark H. Weaver's message of "Mon, 22
 Jul 2019 04:31:48 -0400")
List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix <bug-guix.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/bug-guix>,
 <mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-guix>
List-Post: <mailto:bug-guix@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-guix>,
 <mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "bug-Guix" <bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Mark H Weaver <mhw@netris.org>
Cc: 36747@debbugs.gnu.org

Mark H Weaver writes:

Hi Mark,

> Actually, I have a better idea.  How about starting a new branch at
> commit ef809e3ac036eccc5f9c9edd8fb661d14ae15f2f (the commit used to
> build the current bootstrap binaries for core-updates) and applying the
> fixes there?  Then you can push that new branch to savannah, and we can
> build it and see if we get the same thing?  Hopefully, the only
> difference will be those store references in MesCC.
>
> What do you think?

I have added a very similar set of two patches to wip-cu-binaries,
branched @ ef809e3ac036eccc5f9c9edd8fb661d14ae15f2f.

They give the same md5sum for me as the wip-binaries branch that
branched off of master; so mine are at
http://lilypond.org/janneke/guix/20190722/

After this commit should come the update-commit, using them in
bootstrap.scm.

HTH,
janneke

--=20
Jan Nieuwenhuizen <janneke@gnu.org> | GNU LilyPond http://lilypond.org
Freelance IT http://JoyofSource.com | Avatar=C2=AE http://AvatarAcademy.com