From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mike Gerwitz Subject: bug#33844: Rename ghc-pandoc to pandoc Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2020 20:23:00 -0500 Message-ID: <87pne0q0wb.fsf__42215.5150373996$1582766651$gmane$org@gnu.org> References: <9251b0f558ee90be48420e76d7c4d326@riseup.net> <878skpacih.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <20200226102314.GE12956@E5400> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:51824) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1j77uE-0006Bt-Uv for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Feb 2020 20:24:03 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1j77uE-0008GY-4a for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Feb 2020 20:24:02 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:51994) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1j77uE-0008G0-1l for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Feb 2020 20:24:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1j77uD-0007D9-T5 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Feb 2020 20:24:01 -0500 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20200226102314.GE12956@E5400> (Efraim Flashner's message of "Wed, 26 Feb 2020 12:23:14 +0200") List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: Efraim Flashner Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org, 33844@debbugs.gnu.org, Pierre Neidhardt --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 12:23:14 +0200, Efraim Flashner wrote: > On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 11:06:30AM +0100, Pierre Neidhardt wrote: >> swedebugia@riseup.net writes: >>=20 >> > Reason: it is used standalone to convert between formats. >>=20 >> I agree. What do other people think? > > This is language specific, but like other language-specific packages > this is a package people would specifically search for as 'pandoc' and I > agree, it should be renamed. Ah, for the record, I had searched for pandoc using `guix package -s pandoc` in the past and didn't find what I was looking for, and so fell back to a Debian system. It turns out what I wanted was ghc-pandoc after all. But if I would have put a little bit more effort into looking, perhaps I would have figured that out; I was in a hurry. Thanks for making this change! =2D-=20 Mike Gerwitz Free Software Hacker+Activist | GNU Maintainer & Volunteer GPG: D6E9 B930 028A 6C38 F43B 2388 FEF6 3574 5E6F 6D05 --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJeVxoIAAoJEIyRe39dxRuid10QAIE0j4vhLt7B1/mKgfvJj4OI /5eOFAeEdX2uFW1excxQczOa7H5cKmimH/Xb9+i3b/v2pnlNpk83tHDd0zvzOzii bPWm3M9rvjxJCxBS0qxU26gQjszWnxFgRhpCjc76yT+KnkNGD60s4h/VK8UVZsCW kaUurQkRxdX5UrqH0YDxfv9kAUsYrqdnrayaB3PQcnmSbzVpP/+3OxN6WCRlCKYu f/OYtFz9t1366joOnIoViRsAb+7vD2UlTWUkwlyznrqHw400D2sWL9J9Mc9pBduJ zUs2DZe/7/46dIIcMsj/vzJOcHZRFbE3uwDB4sVZayWbqegwAndUkivzVdRRBNOV +MGRrnog/1BpGfEev9jDKaEE9SEvMHFrrMXf8SfZkHwbtaalmEVSdwTE+un2IF5h xTWEvUiPKS9URT3GBa4NBd4YU3VzkMBlUkcnTx0w9Ed5oky8H/z6wraTwNSKyjlF hpVXqSdgAbyVn3ECpScxifux9uac+u0ZJr0bdJrRaxzhzCEj7mGD3HYJArPdhCkW kCgDFYpUMRM/Q0PoX1RGh1H0ItCpoQAIm0TxehSwSU2v8UXiVUCQ19P57phSWhVb WCuM05oohDyujBMbLn1YYi5n9UXmAvD4+4sKP+w0k7Aduc+FBSAxBc5fVptyXeaI 3SyMZr02xKkBTrINOF3p =LBpP -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--