From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp2 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id oLQjAD4+s17dMgAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 06 May 2020 22:46:22 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp2 with LMTPS id gP6EOEk+s15pEwAAB5/wlQ (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 06 May 2020 22:46:33 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [IPv6:2001:470:142::17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 204B294017B for ; Wed, 6 May 2020 22:46:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:36746 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jWSoA-0005DD-J5 for larch@yhetil.org; Wed, 06 May 2020 18:46:30 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:38264) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jWSni-0004nh-B7 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 06 May 2020 18:46:02 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:58232) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jWSni-0002rC-1a for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 06 May 2020 18:46:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jWSnh-0000Op-Vd for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 06 May 2020 18:46:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#41116: Guix deploy fails with new version of Herd Resent-From: Marius Bakke Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 06 May 2020 22:46:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 41116 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Alex Sassmannshausen , 41116@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 41116-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B41116.15888051451502 (code B ref 41116); Wed, 06 May 2020 22:46:01 +0000 Received: (at 41116) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 May 2020 22:45:45 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41543 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jWSnR-0000OA-2b for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 06 May 2020 18:45:45 -0400 Received: from wout5-smtp.messagingengine.com ([64.147.123.21]:50041) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jWSnO-0000Nv-Re for 41116@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 06 May 2020 18:45:43 -0400 Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id B94163CC; Wed, 6 May 2020 18:45:36 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 06 May 2020 18:45:36 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fastmail.com; h= from:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :mime-version:content-type; s=fm2; bh=WYl0WfiNvoOubIcMrja7/LCn2n mLcCoAqf9iqrYBubo=; b=t2SgBMQI9uN6MRPAkNwoXSc2uL7BHaVozoRYuz+M11 6l7N1BIWeL20sbcndQCbqocz780qDyfgOO9vINB3q+b+yeIDju5nc0En9vjYiyqR HmxkX0JkDXWytPF4pa3ksQbqUTbp75RGdUrGEPcw+4R2tIbZYeKc3M1CckbCWQVy QQZjWXsVu4VlC7NAyAMhcsqyXz/q+zXoAPa10Ij03xurxQ0FDIc9FOIlWWkwxz7p 9PvMt6A7IBhf+Zww0L81uc5zcurhD23RiA4J8gjxMq01MlAlz4F2hXTMZqpSa862 Q7yOiaA34SsEIymKSzYKMQpCJCx8Tk6yDw4/TiFikwbg== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=WYl0Wf iNvoOubIcMrja7/LCn2nmLcCoAqf9iqrYBubo=; b=22/ukPbUQFlU9xdBQWZmOd XASLDuEXhSpeUXnG1cISS2LHnCRR7ff4o3FVKaXBRckxWWgnU0uzfzY4mjowlWtp LRzV20Fl0+vqtm8GDy0XfNTv1Gv27qLYPruS2yg9qJ+5GRqzPDjArC/+Ey/EsXHb aE8TVUt2ewTk713WnHZzXl4Pvh1AYxwnq1HKzrPwIXLD9DPyjdC1yKQ29wqwo0Tm KM9fwPLAISzZOaBYJOGMyoN64WHYG4f2PeeYOWi+wHaqzOfr2e8n172DYxOtbtcI MHQvLVVBFw81PdxBVU/SB8+plMRC3rsDDxqNV+OzGFb18LPT5LevRu1ybDNIrOwA == X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduhedrjeelgddufecutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenuc fjughrpefhvffujghffgffkfggtgesghdtreertdertdenucfhrhhomhepofgrrhhiuhhs uceurghkkhgvuceomhgsrghkkhgvsehfrghsthhmrghilhdrtghomheqnecuggftrfgrth htvghrnheptddvgfegveegiedvffeujeeitdetvdektddugffgtdegfeeitdeikeffudfg ueffnecukfhppeekgedrvddtvddrieekrdejheenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtne curfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehmsggrkhhkvgesfhgrshhtmhgrihhlrdgtohhm X-ME-Proxy: Received: from localhost (ti0006q161-2604.bb.online.no [84.202.68.75]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id BE6743280067; Wed, 6 May 2020 18:45:35 -0400 (EDT) From: Marius Bakke In-Reply-To: <877dxog0wf.fsf@komputilo.eu> References: <877dxog0wf.fsf@komputilo.eu> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.29.3 (https://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/26.3 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Thu, 07 May 2020 00:45:33 +0200 Message-ID: <87pnbg3coi.fsf@devup.no> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) X-BeenThere: bug-guix@gnu.org List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" X-Scanner: scn0 X-Spam-Score: 0.49 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail (rsa verify failed) header.d=fastmail.com header.s=fm2 header.b=t2SgBMQI; dkim=fail (rsa verify failed) header.d=messagingengine.com header.s=fm2 header.b=22/ukPbU; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=fastmail.com (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org designates 2001:470:142::17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org X-Scan-Result: default: False [0.49 / 13.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; GENERIC_REPUTATION(0.00)[-0.49716575202892]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2001:470:142::/48:c]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[fastmail.com]; DWL_DNSWL_FAIL(0.00)[2001:470:142::17:server fail]; R_MISSING_CHARSET(2.50)[]; IP_REPUTATION_HAM(0.00)[asn: 22989(0.11), country: US(-0.00), ip: 2001:470:142::17(-0.50)]; R_DKIM_REJECT(1.00)[fastmail.com:s=fm2,messagingengine.com:s=fm2]; MX_GOOD(-0.50)[cached: eggs.gnu.org]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[fastmail.com:-,messagingengine.com:-]; MAILLIST(-0.20)[mailman]; SIGNED_PGP(-2.00)[]; FORGED_RECIPIENTS_MAILLIST(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_FAIL(0.00)[2001:470:142::17:server fail]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:22989, ipnet:2001:470:142::/48, country:US]; TAGGED_FROM(0.00)[larch=yhetil.org]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[mbakke@fastmail.com,bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; URIBL_BLOCKED(0.00)[gnu.org:email]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.20)[multipart/signed,text/plain]; HAS_LIST_UNSUB(-0.01)[]; RCVD_COUNT_SEVEN(0.00)[10]; FORGED_SENDER_MAILLIST(0.00)[]; DMARC_POLICY_SOFTFAIL(0.10)[fastmail.com : SPF not aligned (relaxed),none] X-TUID: inPwN4nhatDF --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Alex, Alex Sassmannshausen via Bug reports for GNU Guix writes: > Hello, > > I maintain a number of servers using Guix deploy. It seems that the > recent upgrade to Herd in Guix, and specifically commit > 4c0cc7bed3de2c0e2d3a6e95b88693941e839eec might have introduced a bug. > > From my testing, guix deploy currently consistently fails with: > -----------------8<----------------------------->8------------------- > ice-9/boot-9.scm:1667:16: In procedure raise-exception: > ERROR: > 1. &inferior-exception: > arguments: (srfi-34 #" "Unrecognized keyword" () (#:file-creation-mask))] = 7eff2bd7be00>>) > inferior: #f > stack: () > -----------------8<----------------------------->8------------------- > > A workaround is to build the system configuration locally on the target > server, then to reconfigure. It will still error at the same place, but > at this point, after restarting the server, the new version of Herd will > be running and both deploy and reconfigure will work. > > I don't know what a good solution to this could be, but it may be > something we need to consider in future development of Herd. This issue has been reported by a number of users on IRC. I think the problem is that the the #:file-creation-mask keyword requires support from the running Shepherd, which may not have it yet. I think we should revert commit 4c0cc7bed3de2c0e2d3a6e95b88693941e839eec until we find a smooth upgrade path. Can you try it and push if that fixes guix deploy? --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCgAdFiEEu7At3yzq9qgNHeZDoqBt8qM6VPoFAl6zPg0ACgkQoqBt8qM6 VPpsqgf/e47Gm2VdRrIvBlX/D1i4n8S2paqNz9HMOdWpK2GgT/IZpDV3iPwE9Ue5 x7asKQGjHEqElJfuaH+Qud6eCLLv1P9otpVqN6YODpBk9mnIFdgrKjxW3fi4c+iU dk7+gTmdMimbRCI2CZWdfasDV7Ytx4qnaYNNDGAndeQC2rmAD+EFxIoBslN7Vxvn 7MtKqO677AgpMajPWXtYHC5d7GZJw4d9tB1m6D0ynjnISrgFzRlnjRnV28VoXtG6 bpYJHBlnNPoUp3LhzUI8U3N9FMZ48pbpoqzXkTYT/vbL2BVOBOm8xogETdD138AA EyQaBgnIlQy5UEiItaEMcIWRZ7zt9A== =+BgU -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--