From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id KKsFLPTar1+3GwAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Sat, 14 Nov 2020 13:26:12 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1 with LMTPS id yKXiJ/Tar1/XSQAAbx9fmQ (envelope-from ) for ; Sat, 14 Nov 2020 13:26:12 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 21E5F9403A9 for ; Sat, 14 Nov 2020 13:26:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:40052 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kdvZC-0003Gr-Ol for larch@yhetil.org; Sat, 14 Nov 2020 08:26:10 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:58162) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kdvZ4-0003Ge-Ux for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 14 Nov 2020 08:26:02 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:38563) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kdvZ4-0001YU-MA for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 14 Nov 2020 08:26:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kdvZ4-0004a4-FT for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 14 Nov 2020 08:26:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#44612: Read standard input in `guix repl' Resent-From: Pierre Neidhardt Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 14 Nov 2020 13:26:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 44612 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice X-Debbugs-Original-Cc: bug-guix@gnu.org, 44612@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.160536030317529 (code B ref -1); Sat, 14 Nov 2020 13:26:02 +0000 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Nov 2020 13:25:03 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50106 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kdvY6-0004Yd-Eu for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 14 Nov 2020 08:25:03 -0500 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:57042) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kdvY4-0004Y1-6e for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 14 Nov 2020 08:25:00 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:58040) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kdvY4-00038n-17 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 14 Nov 2020 08:25:00 -0500 Received: from relay2-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.194]:57561) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kdvY2-00010X-63 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 14 Nov 2020 08:24:59 -0500 X-Originating-IP: 90.92.160.122 Received: from bababa (lfbn-idf2-1-1094-122.w90-92.abo.wanadoo.fr [90.92.160.122]) (Authenticated sender: mail@ambrevar.xyz) by relay2-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8EAAD40008; Sat, 14 Nov 2020 13:24:54 +0000 (UTC) From: Pierre Neidhardt In-Reply-To: <87lff46v32.fsf@nckx> References: <87h7ptzj8t.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <87zh3l6lzk.fsf@nckx> <87h7ps8duy.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <87lff46v32.fsf@nckx> Date: Sat, 14 Nov 2020 14:24:53 +0100 Message-ID: <87pn4gxe8q.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Received-SPF: pass client-ip=217.70.183.194; envelope-from=mail@ambrevar.xyz; helo=relay2-d.mail.gandi.net X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/11/14 08:24:55 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 3.11 and newer [fuzzy] X-Spam_score_int: 6 X-Spam_score: 0.6 X-Spam_bar: / X-Spam_report: (0.6 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD=0.5, PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD=1.999, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: 0.9 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-Spam-Score: 0.9 (/) X-BeenThere: bug-guix@gnu.org List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: 44612@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" X-Scanner: ns3122888.ip-94-23-21.eu Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -3.11 X-TUID: GVHHCpA1rM+m --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Tobias Geerinckx-Rice writes: > To =E2=80=98it does not work=E2=80=99 I can reply only that Nyxt doesn't = build=20 > [log attached] on current master Shoot! :p Which architecture? I builds for me on x86-64 at commit 403ba4140f52b9ea9483e4c775f102bbb9753e51. I've released Nyxt 2-pre-release-4 a few days ago and I've used it to build the Guix pack, so your feedback is surprising. Or is it a reproducibility issue? =2D-=20 Pierre Neidhardt https://ambrevar.xyz/ --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQFGBAEBCAAwFiEEUPM+LlsMPZAEJKvom9z0l6S7zH8FAl+v2qUSHG1haWxAYW1i cmV2YXIueHl6AAoJEJvc9Jeku8x//C4IAKEggPFLkQ6Bfdxew7ZWwqzWOaC73xrJ +h9ts2jUlyMnlE55JWo/Fm2McPTF2TsdMwAiu+WOKlyQ9/WK8vrY0gn0C6HwarPn 0ab5sGooFdV9zaAbw6REq5nKGKEfGBew6Akw4kF+q61tQWKvdPN1Zl4fW5shsC6L S+3VBSqTVtT2a08q/TdiH9jn7efXpn63BiO9jN2pfoUMUvMRuADTDStojrCmazGl oxGvy4ljHESdiHpNUlzs6Y9qpHjdpK+Wlgd080i0OBeP1LO8mIt8NpcWkTzu4dE/ OzUl8EX7fa6QtVeNLk5khj7YKUiSIw4PSDP29hOyy63ldsocGqKd6nY= =++Te -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--