From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp11.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:8:6d80::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms5.migadu.com with LMTPS id SZwTMEca9GPNzwAAbAwnHQ (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 21 Feb 2023 02:11:35 +0100 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:8:6d80::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp11.migadu.com with LMTPS id oDssL0ca9GNJxwAA9RJhRA (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 21 Feb 2023 02:11:35 +0100 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9939B3E241 for ; Tue, 21 Feb 2023 02:11:35 +0100 (CET) Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=riseup.net header.s=squak header.b=BqHp+4dp; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=riseup.net (policy=none) ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1676941895; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=n44v04laeU9knohcHpBG9HDluwfAczx3QfATsGTBsCRmJOiAnZdSrTDDxwcpGVZ3AjIiZz AxvUctymT+Sdtqxrtec5W72uQT4mpi9UnlGoP1KTb6cSJp7miFm1C+j/MN/O/sncdt5uCB nTGxMcgijpZzPE4fTqb4fbYQQn+CYMbxySYAuWr/Rn+ZiqmVZH0nFUzMdm9O+yUxdYgcZY QR0RprdmW9orF3M1xTQdETjxPVNnafsze1ll7nE3y+LDxGkXLEBbqnPtqb/CJkZXMG03CS NE6V6qYAK2roO6khB7QbnRuwimMBnDwrIhkdhFsuCAVoaHZ3JDZSz8Bb4HpE8Q== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=riseup.net header.s=squak header.b=BqHp+4dp; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=riseup.net (policy=none) ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1676941895; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:resent-cc:resent-from:resent-sender: resent-message-id:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references: list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-post: dkim-signature; bh=AoIBVCrsxI2UbtITXabCbRl1Kvn/oBW4P/s8jC9LRuE=; b=jffNdB5YwpLsaLgz04IxQTevtBthDsiKBdGRIob0VKDRoOpvR051Ht1wp5Tcx8b2WYOhMn 12hhc9vp9bdCAl+/6xcgfQLeWpcrkrnrFG0j715cP6PefPQm5piTVpBNevy+BVP1jgS59f nLPOhz1jv6ezk7PS93tyHm2LbXxu5pgUsWfQjTgTLr3UQZgGlBWGQmS7uv0U9oIMcFQhTE bVxQmcPI26CzqZ5voiH/yitjukygX0HZaPhM7f2oYCbs1lIobZaAtbOaXKmqS9ebsww0+o ntiCIMTKG+rGocAJYvtKcuTijDjrN4dbMzeZ8DYCcMfm8bAbH7CEjyZ9H31zxQ== Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pUGiQ-0003LZ-5S; Mon, 20 Feb 2023 19:41:06 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pUGiN-0003LG-9A for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Feb 2023 19:41:03 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pUGiM-0006gw-Vv for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Feb 2023 19:41:03 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pUGiM-00032h-HP for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Feb 2023 19:41:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#54944: guix pull hangs on 32 bit Resent-From: Csepp Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2023 00:41:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 54944 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Csepp Cc: 54944@debbugs.gnu.org, maxim.cournoyer@gmail.com X-Debbugs-Original-Cc: bug-guix@gnu.org, Maxim Cournoyer , 54944@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.167694000711613 (code B ref -1); Tue, 21 Feb 2023 00:41:02 +0000 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Feb 2023 00:40:07 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53954 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pUGhS-00031F-RJ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 20 Feb 2023 19:40:07 -0500 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:35752) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pUGhJ-00030Q-MC for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 20 Feb 2023 19:40:01 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pUGhI-000399-T8 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Feb 2023 19:39:56 -0500 Received: from mx1.riseup.net ([198.252.153.129]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pUGhH-0006Ed-4f for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Feb 2023 19:39:56 -0500 Received: from fews2.riseup.net (fews2-pn.riseup.net [10.0.1.84]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mail.riseup.net", Issuer "R3" (not verified)) by mx1.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4PLL603pZ8zDqTT; Tue, 21 Feb 2023 00:39:52 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=riseup.net; s=squak; t=1676939992; bh=iF2070rrDW+MNjAakIHYS6Ep0Om9RKJ9wMgVGAL/9yA=; h=References:From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-reply-to:From; b=BqHp+4dpxtvmQNxzorAFyEdQ7M0pImqB/dquopcdXfkI1zB9JjjO4oIohR0j/geN0 PnrsxAd05xby+8mktdxeOEducnbKw4iAP0RwxbfRWd0XqBRPAwHaXtbCIsnDmAvqyw wbSIasFAlmqx4hUTPt0UjOV0SMeC/fK6P7oBvxMQ= X-Riseup-User-ID: B8A59716EC0C90508A44966910CC9C8936476E0CE7A6BCCBDFF5036158336C9E Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fews2.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4PLL5z4Gqgz1y8Z; Tue, 21 Feb 2023 00:39:51 +0000 (UTC) References: <20220415020828.00b7865c@riseup.net> <87czfikio4.fsf@gmail.com> <87k03cndha.fsf@riseup.net> From: Csepp Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2023 01:36:23 +0100 In-reply-to: <87k03cndha.fsf@riseup.net> Message-ID: <87pma3x359.fsf@riseup.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Received-SPF: pass client-ip=198.252.153.129; envelope-from=raingloom@riseup.net; helo=mx1.riseup.net X-Spam_score_int: -27 X-Spam_score: -2.8 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-guix@gnu.org List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 9939B3E241 X-Spam-Score: -2.05 X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -2.05 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn0.migadu.com List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Country: US X-TUID: blO2kl0R5aZx Csepp writes: > Maxim Cournoyer writes: > >> Hi! >> >> raingloom writes: >> >>> It's been at 67% on guix-packages-base for at least an hour now. The >>> system itself is responsive and with the swap I gave it, it has more >>> than enough memory. Htop shows three guile processes at the top of the >>> list when sorted by CPU%, their states are S, D, D. >>> Both CPUs are practically idling. >>> This looks like some kind of lockup to me. >>> >>> Fresh install based on bare-bones example on a 32 bit netbook, but the >>> install image used is the latest tagged version, since apparently there >>> is no 32 bit option for edge. >>> >>> I also tried pulling using channel-with-substitutes, since I'm not too >>> keen on locally building everything on such an old machine. Although >>> Guix itself should frankly not take this long to build if we want to be >>> competitive with other distros. Anyways, pulling with that in >>> channels.scm gives a cert related error, so that's great, means old >>> images can't easily be used for installation. >> >> Have you been able to reproduce this? If so, could you share the commit >> you are starting from and the CPU architecture, so that we may hopefully >> reproduce too? >> >> Thanks, >> >> Maxim > > CPU architecture is x86, commit it happened on last time is 347733b. > Other possibly relevant factors: > * spinning rust storage > * 1GB RAM > * encrypted BTRFS root > * 4GB (encrypted) swap > * 128MB zswap > > The last was not there when I originally submitted the bug. > > The swap is relevant because if it's a timing issue it's very possible > some part of the code assumes reads are almost instant, which is not > true with swap, and delaying a read might be exposing a race condition. Happening again. pulled to: 8320c0c pulled from: 4501a50 Same system. The system version is from november of last year due, because trying to upgrade takes so damn long and often gets stuck on some package with no substitute. So... the situation is not great...