From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dmitri Paduchikh Subject: Re: Distro name Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2013 03:49:17 +0600 Message-ID: <87obh7jlwi.fsf@dpaduchikh.invalid> References: <87zk0r8nv4.fsf@gnu.org> <1357160753.31997@bluehome.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:49239) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TqWBh-0000pT-Pi for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Jan 2013 16:49:28 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TqWBe-0006Nz-TS for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Jan 2013 16:49:25 -0500 Received: from mail-la0-f50.google.com ([209.85.215.50]:53910) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TqWBe-0006Ne-Lc for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Jan 2013 16:49:22 -0500 Received: by mail-la0-f50.google.com with SMTP id fs13so6902345lab.37 for ; Wed, 02 Jan 2013 13:49:19 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <1357160753.31997@bluehome.net> (Jason Self's message of "Wed, 02 Jan 2013 13:05:54 -0800 (PST)") List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: bug-guix@gnu.org Jason Self wrote: > Why not call the distro "GNU"? :) After almost 30 years it's about > time. For 30 years "GNU" has acquired much broader meaning than just a distro. You will have to differentiate distro name from this broader meaning constantly qualifying that it is Guix distro which you are talking about. And it will be harder to search in Google. -- With best regards Dmitri Paduchikh