From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=)
Subject: To-do lists
Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2013 14:09:04 +0100
Message-ID: <87obgm7i4v.fsf_-_@gnu.org>
References: <874nifuuad.fsf@karetnikov.org>
	<201301181118.29250.andreas@enge.fr>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:54296)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1TwBhE-00056L-FT
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Jan 2013 08:09:25 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1TwBh3-0004xX-Gr
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Jan 2013 08:09:23 -0500
Received: from mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr ([192.134.164.82]:21707)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>)
	id 1TwBh3-0004sz-AD
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Jan 2013 08:09:13 -0500
In-Reply-To: <201301181118.29250.andreas@enge.fr> (Andreas Enge's message of
	"Fri, 18 Jan 2013 11:18:29 +0100")
List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix <bug-guix.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/bug-guix>,
	<mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-guix>
List-Post: <mailto:bug-guix@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-guix>,
	<mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Andreas Enge <andreas@enge.fr>
Cc: bug-guix@gnu.org

Hi!

Andreas Enge <andreas@enge.fr> skribis:

> So maybe to avoid working on the same things, I currently have gnunet,=20
> libextractor, flac (with a patch), curl, groff, netpbm, openldap and=20
> ghostscript in my pipeline. These are all dependencies in one way or=20
> another of gnunet. But I think it could take quite a while until I arrive=
=20
> at the top of the (only partially discovered) dependency tree...

Good, thanks for sharing your to-do list.

Another thing we can do to avoid duplicated work, is to commit and push
individual packages as soon as we have them.  For instance, as soon as
you have a working libextractor, go ahead and push it.

Some packages require more effort, and in that case it=E2=80=99s a good ide=
a to
announce your plans as you start working on it.

Or maybe we should use an Org file somewhere, or a wiki, or some sort of
locally-hosted Web 2.0 task management thing.

Ideas?

Ludo=E2=80=99.