From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark H Weaver Subject: bug#22558: gnupg-2.1.11 on x86_64 failed its tests many times on Hydra Date: Thu, 04 Feb 2016 15:22:43 -0500 Message-ID: <87oabwxm24.fsf@netris.org> References: <87si18xn65.fsf@netris.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46756) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aRQQk-0001TQ-0v for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Feb 2016 15:23:06 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aRQQg-00082I-Ra for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Feb 2016 15:23:05 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:52080) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aRQQg-000823-NB for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Feb 2016 15:23:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aRQQg-0001zA-GG for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Feb 2016 15:23:02 -0500 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <87si18xn65.fsf@netris.org> (Mark H. Weaver's message of "Thu, 04 Feb 2016 14:58:42 -0500") List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: 22558@debbugs.gnu.org Mark H Weaver writes: > gnupg-2.1.11 on x86_64 failed its tests many times on Hydra: > > http://hydra.gnu.org:3000/build/990803#tabs-buildsteps > > On all other architectures (i686, armhf, mips64el) it succeeded on the > first try. So far, we've heard no reports of it failing for anyone else > on x86_64. Ludovic built it 3 times on his x86_64 machine and it never > failed. > > It failed in at least two different ways: > > * With only 1 test failure: gpgtar.test. This happened on at least two > different build slaves. > > * With 14 test failures. This happened at least twice, on > hydra.gnunet.org. Eric Bavier reported on #guix that it failed to build on his machine twice in a row, with 14 test failures. Mark