From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Subject: bug#25882: gcc-wrapper doesn't handle response files Date: Mon, 06 Mar 2017 17:22:38 +0100 Message-ID: <87o9xepe7l.fsf@gnu.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:54907) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ckvPd-000331-O8 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Mar 2017 11:23:06 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ckvPa-0001O7-IX for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Mar 2017 11:23:05 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:44785) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ckvPa-0001Nz-Ee for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Mar 2017 11:23:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ckvPa-0007ou-8x for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Mar 2017 11:23:02 -0500 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: In-Reply-To: (Federico Beffa's message of "Sun, 26 Feb 2017 17:58:02 +0100") List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: Federico Beffa Cc: 25882@debbugs.gnu.org Federico Beffa skribis: > gcc-wrapper doesn't handle compiler/linker flags passed through > response files. > > One package which recently started using such files is GHC (I believe > since 7.10.3). For this reason we currently need to patch it. > However, the problem is with our tool chain wrapper and not with GHC > itself. > > See discussion at > https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2017-01/msg01981.html Given that the GHC patch is so small, I have a slight preference for keeping ld-wrapper unchanged and using the GHC patch. To put it differently, the GHC patch is smaller and less error-prone than the changes that would need to be made in ld-wrapper. WDYT? Thanks, Ludo=E2=80=99.