unofficial mirror of bug-guix@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès)
To: sirgazil <lizagris@protonmail.com>
Cc: 26006@debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#26006: [Website] Integral update proposal
Date: Tue, 07 Mar 2017 15:13:30 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87o9xdb2et.fsf@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <pzFj7W63lwIY85c_wcCCmJBOZk6se9SVwTzz0VGqc-6LwpFUgAhyi6V3DmSTHgWQT-kdQ-FgLyF_B_P7qU7CCm1YggyVycXbTQS03i7qZc0=@protonmail.com> (sirgazil's message of "Mon, 06 Mar 2017 21:02:39 -0500")

Hello sirgazil!

It’s always a pleasure to read you.  :-)  Basically, I like all of your
proposals.  Some comments below.

sirgazil <lizagris@protonmail.com> skribis:

> Navigation bar
> ==============
>
> Bar mockup: https://multimedialib.files.wordpress.com/2017/03/guixsd-menu-2017-03-06.png
>
> The current navigation bar is growing, so I think it may be good to define a style so that people can build more complex menus if necessary (but I hope it won't get too complex).
>
> I propose the graphic change you see in the mockup—thin black line at the bottom, navigation items are white while idle, and yellow with a black indicator at the bottom when active— as well as the actual items and their ordering.

Very good idea, definitely an improvement.

> Home page
> =========
>
> Home mockup: https://multimedialib.files.wordpress.com/2017/03/guixsd-home-view-2017-03-06.png
>
> I propose the changes in the mockup above because of the following reasons:
>
> 1. Some people still confuse Guix with GuixSD.
> 2. Some people still ask if Guix can be used on top of other distributions.
> 3. Some people think pitching GuixSD and Guix to specific crowds is good (of course it is). [1]
>
> To address the first two points, I changed the order of the content so that information refers to GuixSD first, Guix as a part of it, and then added a section that mentions specifically the use of Guix in other distros.
>
> For point three, I added a section that links to blog posts that explain GuixSD and Guix in the context of a particular field (this part requires the current News pages to become a Blog instead. See below).
>
> Finally, Ricardo Wurmus commented that there were too many styles of buttons, and I agree with him, so I made them homogeneous.

Agreed.

> News pages
> ==========
>
> News list mockup: https://multimedialib.files.wordpress.com/2017/03/guixsd-blog-list-2017-03-06.png
> News details mockup: https://multimedialib.files.wordpress.com/2017/03/guixsd-blog-post-2017-03-06.png
>
> I suggest to convert News into a blog instead. This could make it easier to add information targeted at different audiences without making the website more complex. Additionally, we could move to the blog content like talks, papers, and posts currently listed in the Help page.

Sounds great.

> I remember that Ludovic commented in #guix that he would like a better way to display talks in the website... [2] With the design in the mockup above, you just click on the "Talks" tag, and you have a nice preview and summary of all talks.

Yes!  There’s also the question of how much work it’ll be to maintain
the talks part (like whether we need to manually make “posters” for each
video and so on.)  The less work, the better.

At the same time, we should reach out to people who’d like to contribute
to Guix in a less-technical way.  There’s a lot that could be done to
keep the web site lively, and it would be great to let more people take
care of that.

> Also, Haunt, the current static site generator used to build the website, can create an atom feed for every tag in the blog, so people can subscribe to whatever topic is more interesting to them. Personally, I'd like to subscribe to a "Security" feed to keep informed about important security updates (see bug #25852). [3]

I agree, we should use tags.  A first step will be to add tags to the
existing posts.

> Packages pages
> ==============
>
> Package list mockup: https://multimedialib.files.wordpress.com/2017/03/guixsd-package-list-2017-03-06.png
> Package details mockup: https://multimedialib.files.wordpress.com/2017/03/guixsd-package-detail-2017-03-06.png
>
> I actually proposed this update in bug #25227,[4] but decided to review the whole website design, so I put it here for reference.

There’s still the issue that we don’t have screenshots, but other than
that it looks great.

> Help page
> =========
>
> * Move talks, papers, and posts to the Blog.
> * Allow little boxes to be distributed along the whole width of the screen.

Good.

> Contribute page
> ===============
>
> * Allow little boxes to be distributed along the whole width of the screen.
>
>
> Infrastructure
> ==============
>
> Personally, I'd like to be able to access the website at "guixsd.org", and use a git repository for deployment of the static website.
>
> However, we are currently using the resources provided by Savannah for hosting, which means we have to use a CVS repository to deploy the website. As mentioned in bug #25227, using CVS could block the implementation of the packages pages as shown in the mockups above (and maybe filtering blog posts by tag) because CVS could choke on the thousands of pages that would be generated (if we keep using a static website).
>
> To find a solution to this issue, Ludovic sent an email to Savannah admins asking for the possibility of using a dynamic website instead. I don't remember if there was an answer.

There was none.

I don’t think we can get the level of support we’d like from the gnu.org
webmasters, who are already swamped.  With Alex S. (Cc’d) and others at
FOSDEM, we discussed this issue and concluded that we should consider
moving the web site to infrastructure we control, where we could do
things in any way we like.

We won’t run a Libreboot-based physical machine for that because with
the current lack of IPMI support, we’d easily end up with downtimes
unacceptable for a web site.  However, we could use some sort of
commercial hosting.

I’m not much of a Web person so you and other Web-savvy people should
consider themselves empowered to come up with a solution.  :-)  We have
some funding that we could probably use for that.

Thoughts?

Thanks,
Ludo’.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-03-07 14:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-03-07  2:02 bug#26006: [Website] Integral update proposal sirgazil
2017-03-07 11:16 ` ng0
2017-03-07 12:53 ` Catonano
2017-03-07 14:13 ` Ludovic Courtès [this message]
2017-03-10 16:46   ` sirgazil
2017-03-10 21:05     ` Ludovic Courtès
2017-10-01 11:02   ` ng0
2017-10-02  7:50     ` Ludovic Courtès
2017-10-02  8:36       ` ng0
2017-10-02  9:10         ` Ludovic Courtès
2017-06-08 19:06 ` sirgazil
2017-06-13 22:08   ` Ludovic Courtès
2017-06-14 20:36     ` sirgazil
2017-06-15  7:59       ` Ludovic Courtès
2017-06-16  2:52         ` sirgazil
2017-06-16  7:05           ` Ludovic Courtès
2017-06-16 14:46             ` sirgazil
2017-06-17  4:57               ` Catonano
2017-06-17  7:16                 ` Catonano
2017-06-17 15:46                   ` sirgazil
2017-06-17 16:09                     ` Catonano
2017-06-17 16:41                       ` sirgazil
2017-06-17 17:12                         ` Catonano
2017-06-17 18:11                           ` sirgazil
2017-06-17 15:19                 ` sirgazil
2017-06-17 15:19                   ` Catonano
2017-07-29 17:53               ` Ludovic Courtès
2017-08-01 22:13                 ` sirgazil
2017-12-06 17:10                   ` bug#26006: New web site is on line! Ludovic Courtès
2017-12-06 17:55                     ` Alex Sassmannshausen
2017-12-06 22:10                       ` Adonay Felipe Nogueira
2017-12-06 22:10                     ` Adonay Felipe Nogueira
2017-12-07  8:54                       ` Ludovic Courtès
2017-12-07  3:01                     ` sirgazil
2017-12-07  9:16                     ` Chris Marusich
2017-12-07 17:10                     ` pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)
2017-12-07 20:58                       ` Ludovic Courtès
2017-12-08 18:42                       ` Quiliro Ordonez Baca
2017-12-08 19:07                         ` pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)
2017-07-01 14:26   ` bug#26006: [Website] Integral update proposal Ludovic Courtès
2017-07-04 20:00     ` sirgazil
2017-07-04 20:09       ` Catonano
2017-07-05  0:45         ` sirgazil
2017-07-04 21:24       ` Ludovic Courtès
2017-07-05  1:26         ` sirgazil

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://guix.gnu.org/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87o9xdb2et.fsf@gnu.org \
    --to=ludo@gnu.org \
    --cc=26006@debbugs.gnu.org \
    --cc=lizagris@protonmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).