From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Subject: bug#33359: On emacs-clang-format Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2018 11:25:13 +0100 Message-ID: <87o9asj6ra.fsf@gnu.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:54699) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gMsN1-0001hp-AA for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 14 Nov 2018 05:26:04 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gMsN0-0003RD-9U for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 14 Nov 2018 05:26:03 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:46749) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gMsN0-0003R5-5v for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 14 Nov 2018 05:26:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gMsN0-0003nt-15 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 14 Nov 2018 05:26:02 -0500 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: In-Reply-To: (Tim Gesthuizen's message of "Mon, 12 Nov 2018 22:40:13 +0100") List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: Tim Gesthuizen , Pierre Neidhardt Cc: 33359@debbugs.gnu.org Hi Tim, Thanks for your feedback. Tim Gesthuizen skribis: > I noticed that someone packaged emacs-clang-format. > There are some problems with the current package definition: > > - clang already distributes the same functionality (Maybe I am missing a > feature that clangs version does not have though). > - The package also includes integration for clang-rename. > - The package should probably have a more generic name and function as a > package for all emacs integration clang offers. > - The clang package is installing the same files under share/clang. > Maybe those should be removed. > - The license is incorrect. The version that is cloned from github > also seems to have some licensing issues (Missing full license...) > > You'll find an example package definition attached. > This can probably be optimized a little bit more so that the full clang > tarball does not need to be extracted twice. Pierre, WDYT? Thanks in advance! :-) Ludo=E2=80=99.