From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Subject: bug#36747: Official MesCC bootstrap binaries differ from my locally built ones Date: Sun, 18 Aug 2019 11:26:40 +0200 Message-ID: <87o90mbz8v.fsf@gnu.org> References: <875znwcoo9.fsf@netris.org> <87ef2j1pgt.fsf@gnu.org> <87ftmy51kk.fsf@netris.org> <87muh6sib4.fsf@gnu.org> <877e8a79mz.fsf@netris.org> <87pnm2ufv1.fsf@gnu.org> <87lfwpqpb7.fsf@netris.org> <875znt2hlc.fsf@gnu.org> <87zhke97xj.fsf@netris.org> <87h86mdaex.fsf@gnu.org> <8736i5a7mb.fsf@netris.org> <87mugdbc9r.fsf@gnu.org> <8736i3iyas.fsf@devup.no> <87zhkbhd07.fsf@devup.no> <87v9uz4msh.fsf@netris.org> <87woffh66h.fsf@devup.no> <87o90pgzak.fsf@gnu.org> <87mug9cagh.fsf@netris.org> <87v9uvbhhh.fsf@gnu.org> <875zmv1db7.fsf@netris.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:55007) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1hzHSp-0002Iz-7X for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 18 Aug 2019 05:27:04 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hzHSo-0007Gg-4N for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 18 Aug 2019 05:27:03 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:48522) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hzHSo-0007GO-0W for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 18 Aug 2019 05:27:02 -0400 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <875zmv1db7.fsf@netris.org> (Mark H. Weaver's message of "Sat, 17 Aug 2019 21:17:53 -0400") List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: Mark H Weaver Cc: 36747@debbugs.gnu.org Hi, Mark H Weaver skribis: > Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote: >> It=E2=80=99s currently being evaluated: >> >> https://ci.guix.gnu.org/jobset/core-updates-next > > Thanks, although I guess all of the builds will fail, unless someone > manually added the new bootstrap tarballs to Berlin's store, or uploaded > them to one of the URLs in %bootstrap-base-urls. Indeed, it=E2=80=99s failing for that reason now, I hadn=E2=80=99t realized. To be continued=E2=80=A6 Ludo=E2=80=99.