From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice via Bug reports for GNU Guix Subject: bug#37421: [PATCH] gnu: node: Disable tests that fail with openssl@1.1.1d. Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2019 23:39:10 +0200 Message-ID: <87o8zkar6z.fsf@nckx> References: <877e6839f0.fsf@wioo.waw.pl> <20190916135228.22045-1-me@tobias.gr> <87ef0g5ilf.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:34850) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1i9yj6-00070i-Ly for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Sep 2019 17:40:05 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1i9yj5-0008RL-BT for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Sep 2019 17:40:04 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:42401) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1i9yj5-0008RH-8b for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Sep 2019 17:40:03 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1i9yj5-0006bF-1n for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Sep 2019 17:40:03 -0400 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: In-reply-to: <87ef0g5ilf.fsf@gnu.org> List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= , Jelle Licht Cc: 37421@debbugs.gnu.org --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Ludovic Court=C3=A8s =E5=86=99=E9=81=93=EF=BC=9A > Could we take a look at what these failures are about to see how=20 > bad > that might be? Jelle Licht =E5=86=99=E9=81=93=EF=BC=9A > Interestingly enough, https://github.com/nodejs/node/issues/3881=20 > notes > issues with exactly these two tests. Perhaps there is a=20 > regressions in > our case? Thanks, and indeed! That is _quite_ the coincidence=E2=80=A6 Unfortunately, I don't see any mention of a time-out in my logs &=20 the truncation of the backtrace at Object. (=E2=80=A6/test/parallel/test-crypto-dh.js:124:8) at Module._compile (internal/modules/cjs/loader.js:701:30) at Object.Module._extensions..js=20 (internal/modules/cjs/loader.js:712:10) at Module.load (internal/modules/cjs/loader.js:600:32) at tryModuleLoad (internal/modules/cjs/loader.js:539:12) at Function.Module._load (internal/modules/cjs/loader.js:531:3) at Function.Module.runMain=20 (internal/modules/cjs/loader.js:754:12) at startup (internal/bootstrap/node.js:283:19) at bootstrapNodeJSCore (internal/bootstrap/node.js:622:3) ... happens at run time: grepping the output of =E2=80=98--keep=E2=80=99 doesn'= t=20 reveal a more complete one :-( I don't know how to hack the tests to spit out more. Someone who=20 knows node/js more than I do needs to step in and save us. Is=20 that you, Jelle? :-) Kind regards, T G-R --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEfo+u0AlEeO9y5k0W2Imw8BjFSTwFAl2AAP4ACgkQ2Imw8BjF STwCBw/6A3sC41PfoBZMEAvVacgZwlCnjCS+ST7djEUYyNsb4OVTQ7xxYO1v63a6 F/o6sy87GZCrgu2ht+YpmsgslSivbWl8qG0D5gKNhKBSRYJJ2hd3QOl6RAPRzaLA ZBHj4oAZm65EH+riqx8ZXnHp8Id+vhRLlFVxh/sRj5PtSaDHO01nSMcUtT3fdEhc n06927HeaOEw+LriFpIV9RjYSDVq+IwpTf60vRM9C4kiIh/MJs5b1KGBM8fqOozF Fp8sgVJA3duO17Qh+7GHG0gi67P6nr57D/XQbo0xSjoTtj2zgA9jzvX/lv2c6kfr 7MKJ3aYrMIhF1cHtR3KpoGyexAJm5PeRAZPR55pbeSTlCVZULMWY/VL7XzF+cjjN Hsr3UJ2Tkc0zVBHapg+qQoD+vnDtYfwsPIsql2rtbgycaAQbRXyy6HYRAkhyA5+n LnUHLzN1JhyHY9EalPmcK8Xzi1X+9viWv/moXgyDT26QvGFQ42H0GW0OqDwtYyHH txTr6qorqPjpsNArt+9+/FpE6SHpC/MCsXwdyKQhZD2nX6Zp2hC4XrFy6n3e0aV/ fOyQpJwxPCECRuFKHYFVdF8yucoRg8viWBKVpqm0WvMtgMORsANntufNyDisKvt5 3fyn/BKiX6ER9Hl1R0Ocf4Csu9MuesBKO6B8swfe8NVFCxZx/JE= =434d -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--