From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@gnu.org>
Subject: bug#40125: Problem with guix offload: Remote channel closed
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2020 10:50:03 +0100
Message-ID: <87o8snqu2c.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <CAA2XvwKTtJvmKVkgKQw+ZnkyFxdScNLx6KWx4DQx3eP4rt8UUw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAA2XvwKrnhVRNykuXDtMvcqFAU7d0MRvaOF6xzhYCtQxu_5LPw@mail.gmail.com>
 <87eetl1zce.fsf@gnu.org>
 <CAA2XvwJs34HBvSamsXtK7=5LydNkgxEAxJsYAU_qSYnemr-yoA@mail.gmail.com>
 <87pnd5wdyq.fsf@gnu.org>
 <CAA2XvwJYu9rdZPOCTO54a4aLHFt8LngoDxtAVc151AnEcanjEw@mail.gmail.com>
 <8736a0uni2.fsf@gnu.org>
 <CAA2XvwJ9Td30sqWYWLhB9h9iM_T9GTK2KjNoJYHGWNeR4skpDQ@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:56494)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1jGJjb-0002ZD-LG
 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Mar 2020 05:51:04 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1jGJja-0002Ve-Ih
 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Mar 2020 05:51:03 -0400
Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:45501)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)
 (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>)
 id 1jGJja-0002VY-FW
 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Mar 2020 05:51:02 -0400
Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1jGJja-0001MJ-ED
 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Mar 2020 05:51:02 -0400
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.40125.B40125.15849570125123@debbugs.gnu.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAA2XvwJ9Td30sqWYWLhB9h9iM_T9GTK2KjNoJYHGWNeR4skpDQ@mail.gmail.com>
 (Mikael Djurfeldt's message of "Sun, 22 Mar 2020 22:40:39 +0100")
List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix <bug-guix.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/bug-guix>,
 <mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-guix>
List-Post: <mailto:bug-guix@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-guix>,
 <mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org
Sender: "bug-Guix" <bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
To: Mikael Djurfeldt <mikael@djurfeldt.com>
Cc: 40125@debbugs.gnu.org

Hi Mikael,

Mikael Djurfeldt <mikael@djurfeldt.com> skribis:

> On Sun, Mar 22, 2020 at 9:46 PM Ludovic Court=C3=A8s <ludo@gnu.org> wrote:
>
>> Mikael Djurfeldt <mikael@djurfeldt.com> skribis:
>>
>> We=E2=80=99re missing a tiny bit.  :-)  Could you run strace with =E2=80=
=98-s 3000=E2=80=99 or
>> similar so that it doesn=E2=80=99t truncate it?
>>
>> (The =E2=80=9Cstrange characters=E2=80=9D are Unicode HORIZONTAL ELLIPSI=
S.)
>>
>
> Ah... :)
>
> Here's a larger chunk of backtrace:
>
> 19530 read(20, "Backtrace:\n          13 (apply-smob/1 #<catch-closure
> 563a9e2f92a0>)\nIn ice-9/boot-9.scm:\n    718:2 12 (call-with-prompt
> (\"prompt\") #<procedure 563a9e3167e0 \342\200\246> \342\200\246)\nIn
> ice-9/eval.scm:\n    619:8 11 (_ #(#(#<directory (guile-user)
> 563a9e39a750>)))\nIn ice-9/command-line.scm:\n   181:18 10 (_ #<input:
> string 563a9e3a8bd0>)\nIn unknown file:\n           9 (eval (begin
> (use-modules (guix) (srfi srfi-34) # #) \342\200\246) #)\nIn
> ice-9/eval.scm:\n   721:20  8 (primitive-eval (begin (use-modules (guix)
> (srfi \342\200\246) \342\200\246) \342\200\246))\nIn ice-9/psyntax.scm:\n
>  1241:36  7 (expand-top-sequence ((begin (use-modules (guix) \342\200\246)
> \342\200\246)) \342\200\246)\n  1194:19  6 (parse _ ((\"placeholder\"
> placeholder)) ((top) #(# # \342\200\246)) \342\200\246)\n  1233:19  5
> (parse _ ((\"placeholder\" placeholder)) ((top) #(# # \342\200\246))
> \342\200\246)\n   285:10  4 (parse _ ((\"placeholder\" placeholder)) (())=
 _
> c&e (eval) \342\200\246)\nIn ice-9/boot-9.scm:\n  3389:20  3
> (process-use-modules _)\n   222:17  2 (map1 (((guix)) ((srfi srfi-34))
> ((rnrs io ports)) (#)))\n  3390:31  1 (_ ((guix)))\n   2809:6  0
> (resolve-interface (guix) #:select _ #:hide _ #:prefix _
> \342\200\246)\n\nice-9/boot-9.scm:2809:6: In procedure
> resolve-interface:\nno code for module (guix)\n", 16384) =3D 1150

Thanks!  Commit 8f53d73493a2949e2db28cd7d689a690b2d9479a improves error
reporting in this case.

This can be tested by running =E2=80=9Cguix copy --to=3DHOST coreutils=E2=
=80=9D for a host
where Guix modules are missing.

Thanks,
Ludo=E2=80=99.