From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Guillaume Le Vaillant <glv@posteo.net>
Subject: bug#40652: #36924 way solves the problem for me
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2020 10:57:26 +0200
Message-ID: <87o8rryfih.fsf@yamatai>
References: <20200416002020.GA381@tulip> <20200416053137.GA787@tulip>
 <87pnc7yjgd.fsf@yamatai> <877dyfkegp.fsf@gnu.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";
 micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Return-path: <bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:48471)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1jP0LS-00072r-Qe
 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 04:58:03 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1jP0LR-00040J-Rl
 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 04:58:02 -0400
Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:54218)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)
 (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>)
 id 1jP0LR-00040D-Pd
 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 04:58:01 -0400
Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1jP0LR-0003TB-PB
 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 04:58:01 -0400
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.40652.B40652.158702745713304@debbugs.gnu.org>
In-reply-to: <877dyfkegp.fsf@gnu.org>
List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix <bug-guix.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/bug-guix>,
 <mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-guix>
List-Post: <mailto:bug-guix@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-guix>,
 <mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org
Sender: "bug-Guix" <bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@gnu.org>
Cc: 40652@debbugs.gnu.org

--=-=-=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


Ludovic Court=C3=A8s <ludo@gnu.org> skribis:

> Hi Guillaume,
>
> Guillaume Le Vaillant <glv@posteo.net> skribis:
>
>> I don't know if it's related, but recently I had GDM crashes at boot
>> after reconfiguring a system using gdm-service-type (generation n) to
>> make it use slim-service-type instead (generation n+1), and then
>> reconfiguring to gdm-service-type again (generation n+2).
>>
>> The problem was that the 'gdm' user id number (or group id number) was
>> not the same in generations n and n+2, which prevented GDM from
>> accessing the '/var/lib/gdm' directory.
>
> When did that happen?
>
> Commit a43e9157ef479e94c19951cc9d228cf153bf78ee (Sep. 2019) supposedly
> ensures that /var/lib/gdm has proper ownership.
>
> Thanks,
> Ludo=E2=80=99.

I think it was around 2 weeks ago.

--=-=-=
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iHUEARYKAB0WIQQkUwKxurH4Z/3KlryPP4Yfgut6mgUCXpgd9gAKCRCPP4Yfgut6
mlsjAQDgeGj5sSrhzEIn+3B/Q+kGVUPEVQuMPWrKrpbK4j485gEA5ARBBD8qe3Ra
fVyEqNXnDjiwviuaKE7wk9AvZJnShgE=
=YR+e
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-=-=--