From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp11.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms5.migadu.com with LMTPS id 4Be/B/VEtGL6CgEAbAwnHQ (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2022 12:48:21 +0200 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp11.migadu.com with LMTPS id cL+0B/VEtGIbhAAA9RJhRA (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2022 12:48:21 +0200 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 88E76112F8 for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2022 12:48:18 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost ([::1]:40784 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1o4KNl-00042w-K6 for larch@yhetil.org; Thu, 23 Jun 2022 06:48:17 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:52636) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1o4Jlo-0002Us-5t for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Jun 2022 06:09:06 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:43622) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1o4Jln-0002mB-51 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Jun 2022 06:09:03 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1o4Jll-0003k2-T7 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Jun 2022 06:09:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#36924: GDM, GNOME Shell, etc. break when there are stale caches Resent-From: Ricardo Wurmus Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2022 10:09:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 36924 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: moreinfo To: zimoun Cc: 36924@debbugs.gnu.org, Liliana Marie Prikler Received: via spool by 36924-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B36924.165597891214338 (code B ref 36924); Thu, 23 Jun 2022 10:09:01 +0000 Received: (at 36924) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Jun 2022 10:08:32 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37517 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1o4JlI-0003jC-92 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 23 Jun 2022 06:08:32 -0400 Received: from sender4-of-o50.zoho.com ([136.143.188.50]:21016) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1o4JlG-0003j3-5a for 36924@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 23 Jun 2022 06:08:30 -0400 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1655978906; cv=none; d=zohomail.com; s=zohoarc; b=SXLIkFli48wTk7vpauqVFgr2eli0yWfFhXAfSUkHvZiCwUkJMr5U5S0tC3VQ70mQipOj9X1evPZkWnAynKEp+wn69XrzUvQaa7A8F26naB6nrMVoe0cGng++wbtOFUptTgZ+CbkCCoge0jEaM0vVTgmRvo7Og96NBmcmWslBKXw= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=zohomail.com; s=zohoarc; t=1655978906; h=Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Cc:Date:From:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Message-ID:References:Subject:To; bh=WolVsgVcw2kzXrrLVcWCvz9AvVrxJQZth48ZfaLElMA=; b=Ciisv1xe17e4Ff4WgWQoGaZArL18ReJBUD9QOrXibh27jURBwPIdSog0V4rF+XkjY6e2AHUbGpY9yV1NEUMnz8Y2ffzbLEREzprP8UzIv0Acna65/A5Z6UoeHVb9bSYFburf7D+gCE01WslLlNk1IweA86WGgA7nvadcqG85IkQ= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.zohomail.com; dkim=pass header.i=elephly.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=rekado@elephly.net; dmarc=pass header.from= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1655978906; s=zoho; d=elephly.net; i=rekado@elephly.net; h=References:From:From:To:To:Cc:Cc:Subject:Subject:Date:Date:In-reply-to:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-Id:Reply-To; bh=WolVsgVcw2kzXrrLVcWCvz9AvVrxJQZth48ZfaLElMA=; b=XTM/pL6vV/rM49sq8rfw8kv5K6k4b4i0nJaFJcdJlDKeIpMYvjkfJLkni4K/5jlp 4J5ycy7naVrvgA6btzXnSSZzqCi/kZdqIYRUI2Nu5LfEoVRd/HxqKcQortQ3LyaUrFu iC2jV+dRuuGNv0MyX/El4RTFZhpKBrisjQjJ6tJ8= Received: from localhost (i5E862D93.versanet.de [94.134.45.147]) by mx.zohomail.com with SMTPS id 1655978905354516.1842632251273; Thu, 23 Jun 2022 03:08:25 -0700 (PDT) References: <87tvawzlvq.fsf@elephly.net> <867d8k29hi.fsf@gmail.com> <95cef7888b04a157f3ceb0ef40904f88a02c250b.camel@gmail.com> <86wngkwc40.fsf@gmail.com> <86edzf91e1.fsf@gmail.com> User-agent: mu4e 1.6.11; emacs 28.1 From: Ricardo Wurmus Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2022 12:07:54 +0200 In-reply-to: <86edzf91e1.fsf@gmail.com> X-URL: https://elephly.net X-PGP-Key: https://elephly.net/rekado.pubkey X-PGP-Fingerprint: BCA6 89B6 3655 3801 C3C6 2150 197A 5888 235F ACAC Message-ID: <87o7yjbskq.fsf@elephly.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-ZohoMailClient: External X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-guix@gnu.org List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-To: larch@yhetil.org X-Migadu-Country: US ARC-Message-Signature: i=2; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1655981301; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding:resent-cc: resent-from:resent-sender:resent-message-id:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=WolVsgVcw2kzXrrLVcWCvz9AvVrxJQZth48ZfaLElMA=; b=VONgzuAtUXaH3n2KAtyeWBllE8DVqBz7jL7d88qUC2jdVUBHVSVDowubfmKAvxJlkFfQ+q DUuCU3HYx01+1u599ri90XhfbBLNmSMIwPUXS+z2uC6DCkqjmP5Y0z+q6Ns3VppSrxnaQ0 WGIv72lF9XtYOrzL/qM6zTmrF8/ogbHad7+Nkf38StWMSuNJqBxJdcu+F2I9b/Oa3eLbal nt2J+m2UkUIddUGB2oWl1TDyNrcjK20ngH4bn8TDQLzKAvv13kOSGEaSzjJlLRo0NX+/jP UjFIKaxNOrQSeLOjDIUryWdrfigNhbCnyuSeG1ZnWTp0EaZqyzYorpO6jA4q/Q== ARC-Seal: i=2; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1655981301; a=rsa-sha256; cv=fail; b=cMyP2OyU6MVZv3qY8gWUF6SMjc+AD7sk+hiMKBHJn0NQSq16C1DsyOzEA01x9NH1cMedqe 1Shko6JtpUd6Ypgkl/aHxbrw9LAu19mbZdzDt/pHGwfqUS/p9qc0xxf5LS4j2y65tzSkcR utONYl/ayvGd4xldosPvNVIeMOxSJNh+HC7mdQ0do8+tHurhYEGpZrkQrz4XXHgGuDom0i 9x5gi47o0EnenLkezNsyo1NCyOED3osho613gk5TQXTho++Jie6JDtf1j6pbuT3KP/SUTX K7KyOL+A6k9BAJJVZj4nIsLgaIJfgPweMmoyjwDMq1luQ36zfoT3onzkXDsPug== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=2; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=elephly.net header.s=zoho header.b="XTM/pL6v"; arc=reject ("signature check failed: fail, {[1] = sig:zohomail.com:reject}"); dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" X-Migadu-Spam-Score: 2.04 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=elephly.net header.s=zoho header.b="XTM/pL6v"; arc=reject ("signature check failed: fail, {[1] = sig:zohomail.com:reject}"); dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 88E76112F8 X-Spam-Score: 2.04 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn1.migadu.com X-TUID: n1lBiY1vzuOX zimoun writes: > Hi, > > On Wed, 23 Mar 2022 at 23:14, zimoun wrote: > >> Hum, do we keep a report open based on =C2=AB maybe =C2=BB or =C2=AB we = don=E2=80=99t know =C2=BB or >> =C2=AB I suppose =C2=BB? It is an honest question and not a rhetoric on= e. :-) >> >> Well, how is this bug report actionable? Other said, what is missing as >> concrete information for closing. >> >> From my understanding of your feedback, the current answer to =C2=AB Is = it >> still an issue? =C2=BB seems =C2=AB no =C2=BB. It does not mean that a = bug is not >> around =E2=80=93 so many bugs are around ;-) =E2=80=93 but it means that= this bug is not >> a blocking issue, again from my understanding. >> >> Could you confirm that the bug is appearing for you? Else, let close it >> and reopen once the bug appears. WDYT? > > I am proposing to close if no objection. I agree because it is not actionable as it is now. --=20 Ricardo