From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp11.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms5.migadu.com with LMTPS id 6NAWCAoLv2KWhgAAbAwnHQ (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 01 Jul 2022 16:56:10 +0200 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp11.migadu.com with LMTPS id oDwHCAoLv2LzKwEA9RJhRA (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 01 Jul 2022 16:56:10 +0200 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BB562E430 for ; Fri, 1 Jul 2022 16:56:09 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost ([::1]:51716 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1o7I40-000071-V0 for larch@yhetil.org; Fri, 01 Jul 2022 10:56:08 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:47876) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1o7HvE-0001md-Ot for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Jul 2022 10:47:05 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:44950) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1o7HvB-0008OZ-St for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Jul 2022 10:47:03 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1o7HvB-0004zh-QH for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Jul 2022 10:47:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#56334: Should asdf-build-system/sbcl use load-system instead of compile-system? Resent-From: Pierre Neidhardt Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 01 Jul 2022 14:47:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 56334 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Guillaume Le Vaillant Cc: 56334@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 56334-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B56334.165668681919187 (code B ref 56334); Fri, 01 Jul 2022 14:47:01 +0000 Received: (at 56334) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Jul 2022 14:46:59 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38847 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1o7Hv9-0004zP-Dr for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 01 Jul 2022 10:46:59 -0400 Received: from relay7-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.200]:38753) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1o7Hv8-0004zD-6n for 56334@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 01 Jul 2022 10:46:58 -0400 Received: (Authenticated sender: mail@ambrevar.xyz) by mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2FA3A20005; Fri, 1 Jul 2022 14:46:51 +0000 (UTC) From: Pierre Neidhardt In-Reply-To: <87k08xypu9.fsf@kitej> References: <87edz5jfxm.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <87o7y9yss4.fsf@kitej> <87tu81vyxe.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <87k08xypu9.fsf@kitej> Date: Fri, 01 Jul 2022 16:46:51 +0200 Message-ID: <87o7y8x544.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-guix@gnu.org List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-To: larch@yhetil.org X-Migadu-Country: US ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1656687370; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:resent-cc:resent-from:resent-sender: resent-message-id:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references: list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-post; bh=nONAxAUl+WMl04sQeZFtBrSJNWPS+mZM/3LNP2sbs+Y=; b=pDHXzz9kAc7c5fWufudN33av/gkndXbdI9oUsboepNbMiFCSBISLZt4JPvv1ICtOvMCCpX U4CAT6qBamLksZRWRXB1+YDf+72aiCK4mD9Z5wT+2BJTvG0SVqbYs9+/nuls2wdraJuM3A VU2pYWa1ubUR+RG7A6wgg5CnUD5iDofv+368oziXJt31XbkkwfkV2BlF49SlRc0s6aIESg 8pBVFzcf3MtrXP/Oo0Ww5qSYxhYVik0f5o1X34HgKmDjatUHhVP54w48gz1Mz2CirEkVSO craVwrmM4IZEkGAQZ4oHYBTKP7jUTvPfk4OQtqqRgpr93ul6UFgo2Xnghm30Hg== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1656687370; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=UYIgTXxJ2m2QQ4MtU8PCmtPIeDYTkKdTEKOfjUhOxSmPTfNYqssLjbke0hS1pQIx1JCRBK mJz1Y0SVV7Fa9vWPVDpUtAAYbvmkGvFKeQ3AedxavAh2OPGAML+CERoN5fApG8qUvz4obs 46E5ssBnELl7BoUfT63RhZ7r+z85eh47VzrrHHtFgjQgpk49PEDlve7930YV7DKrj6Ovus gH5vutgfPk84kDg1Hhp3XlWiCCAfXN7bh3kdWPcJAJL/ydi/zwtoTWntaQP6gY4TIL6CGc i8DJaV3Z9MWVhS+bdcl/tcxegy/9qKIkKIfZq5zszJ8vNKLDYi3t+UnrlOSRHA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -4.15 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" X-Migadu-Queue-Id: BB562E430 X-Spam-Score: -4.15 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn1.migadu.com X-TUID: uFP72av0gZSK --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Hi Guillaume, I gave it a go and your suggestion indeed cuts it for cleavir and cl-gamepad. It did not fix it for the tests though. I did some more testing, and this is what I found out on one of the failing systems (cl-reexport): from a --pure sbcl repl, if I load the .asd files manually then run test-system, I can reproduce the issue. However, if I run --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- (asdf:initialize-source-registry `(:source-registry (:tree ,(uiop:getcwd)) :inherit-configuration)) (asdf:test-system :cl-reexport) --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- then it works! In other words, I believe that `asdf:load-asd' is yet another under-used ASDF function, and we should probably go with the officially recommended way, namely adding the source folder to the ASDF registry. Thoughts? I'll try it out then send a patch. Cheers! --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQFGBAEBCAAwFiEEUPM+LlsMPZAEJKvom9z0l6S7zH8FAmK/CNsSHG1haWxAYW1i cmV2YXIueHl6AAoJEJvc9Jeku8x/pNsH/AmNpDwOYzhYcl74U6DJJieJeHSVbXQD sswQlVO7MtldapOqbC1jovsvAN3fSiF6hWM7b11bwtJC49fKZq1zX1G9I57q3Mnv YSyzmto9ERf32eAR18z2tvccmUMx9rJhcHc9isCFXrxFff7KPB6DdpS8pUPXpXT6 +gGTXcVhssztZOOC+SecH7n3c/Do0zUtAGbYeJvF1fGMMock9XcFqNhlDwA18yPk fWHOEuTu/I8BlD5odomGA0PR6MV+uECKEzTLofzPY4hPUX9ux/Ku/r6sfbSPLnNE Kt/LYeHyxx+8XuRdwILGdphQIV8Fv5RKLh8Ly3AQ0zGnpMAWRUlG6lk= =BgXf -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--