From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=)
Subject: Re: To-do lists
Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2013 22:15:51 +0100
Message-ID: <87mww642go.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <874nifuuad.fsf@karetnikov.org>
	<201301181118.29250.andreas@enge.fr> <87obgm7i4v.fsf_-_@gnu.org>
	<201301181416.26983.andreas@enge.fr> <87a9s6idsj.fsf@karetnikov.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:40812)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1TwJI3-0000Za-8C
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Jan 2013 16:15:56 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1TwJI2-0004sG-7k
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Jan 2013 16:15:55 -0500
Received: from mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr ([192.134.164.105]:11874)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>)
	id 1TwJI2-0004s1-1c
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Jan 2013 16:15:54 -0500
In-Reply-To: <87a9s6idsj.fsf@karetnikov.org> (Nikita Karetnikov's message of
	"Fri, 18 Jan 2013 12:47:06 -0500")
List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix <bug-guix.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/bug-guix>,
	<mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-guix>
List-Post: <mailto:bug-guix@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-guix>,
	<mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Nikita Karetnikov <nikita@karetnikov.org>
Cc: bug-guix@gnu.org

Nikita Karetnikov <nikita@karetnikov.org> skribis:

>> That is what I do. But I am not fond of pushing packages for which I
>> would still like to add more inputs; it is possible to push
>> libextractor without lots of optional dependencies. This is what my
>> proposed patch for vorbis-tools does, there is a FIXME explaining
>> which inputs are missing. But then there is a higher risk of
>> forgetting to add them.
>
> I suggest to announce such things on the list.

Yes, but that=E2=80=99s inconvenient.  Typically, I=E2=80=99m likely to hav=
e forgotten
what others are doing by the time I actually start packaging something.
;-)

>>> Or maybe we should use an Org file somewhere, or a wiki, or some sort of
>>> locally-hosted Web 2.0 task management thing.
>
> Can Savannah be used?

Could be, though it=E2=80=99s really inconvenient (heavyweight, browser-onl=
y).

>> Anything would be fine for me as long as it is easy. Maybe a wiki
>> would be easiest for the time being.
>
> I guess that the easiest thing is to stick with this list.

You mean this /mailing/ list?

Ludo=E2=80=99.