From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark H Weaver Subject: bug#32229: Hydra evaluation failure: service 'ssh-daemon' requires 'loopback' Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2018 18:40:05 -0400 Message-ID: <87muul38ha.fsf@netris.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40889) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fgcwY-0001Nb-LL for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Jul 2018 17:28:07 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fgcwU-0006ak-LV for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Jul 2018 17:28:06 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:45015) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fgcwU-0006a2-Ga for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Jul 2018 17:28:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fgcwU-0008Gg-Be for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Jul 2018 17:28:02 -0400 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40695) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fgcvU-0001KQ-9t for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Jul 2018 17:27:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fgcvQ-0004nI-8c for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Jul 2018 17:27:00 -0400 Received: from world.peace.net ([64.112.178.59]:57334) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fgcvQ-0004mE-0l for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Jul 2018 17:26:56 -0400 List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: 32229@debbugs.gnu.org Hydra failed its most recent evaluation attempt for the 'master' jobset, with the following error: --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- considering jobset gnu:master (last checked 25842s ago) checking out Git branch master from https://git.savannah.gnu.org/r/guix.git Initialized empty Git repository in /tmp/git-checkout-tmp-5663/git-export/.git/ >From /var/lib/hydra/scm/git/f08e53b7f0f3ce68a74e8745c37add3d0aecabda3e30c724b0d838fdc6743e2b * branch master -> FETCH_HEAD * [new branch] master -> origin/master Switched to a new branch 'fetchgit' removing `.git'... hash is 631480c61f698a8519ea0f2e4663fe841ea7bfe8a332e4a44eb4e4fe051143c9 path is /gnu/store/zgj9yr6i285079pzs77jl5kka6n9j3fy-git-export evaluator hydra-eval-guile-jobs hydra-eval-guile-jobs returned exit code 1: adding `/gnu/store/zgj9yr6i285079pzs77jl5kka6n9j3fy-git-export' to the load path prepending "/gnu/store/zgj9yr6i285079pzs77jl5kka6n9j3fy-git-export" to the load path prepending "/gnu/store/zgj9yr6i285079pzs77jl5kka6n9j3fy-git-export" to the load path evaluating for 'x86_64-linux' (heap size: 170.0 MiB)... warning: SQLite database is busy Backtrace: In ice-9/eval.scm: 196:43 19 (_ #(#(#(#) # ?) ?)) In ice-9/boot-9.scm: 152:2 18 (with-fluid* _ _ _) 152:2 17 (with-fluid* _ _ _) 152:2 16 (with-fluid* _ _ _) In unknown file: 15 (_ # # #) In ice-9/eval.scm: 191:27 14 (_ #(#(# #) ?)) 196:35 13 (_ #(#(#(#(#) ?) ?) ?)) 293:34 12 (_ #(#(#(#) #< ?) ?)) 293:34 11 (_ #(#(# # ?) ?)) In srfi/srfi-1.scm: 592:29 10 (map1 (#< type: # ?)) 592:29 9 (map1 (#< type: #?> ?)) 592:17 8 (map1 (#< type: # ?)) In ice-9/eval.scm: 293:34 7 (_ #(#(#(# # # ?) ?) ?)) In srfi/srfi-1.scm: 592:17 6 (map1 (#< type: # ?)) In ice-9/eval.scm: 213:29 5 (_ #(#(#) #)) 159:9 4 (_ #(#(#) #)) 202:35 3 (_ #(#(#) #)) 619:8 2 (_ #(#(#) #)) In srfi/srfi-1.scm: 640:9 1 (for-each # ?) 640:9 0 (for-each # ?) srfi/srfi-1.scm:640:9: In procedure for-each: Throw to key `srfi-34' with args `(#)'. --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- This is almost certainly related to the following commit: https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git/commit/?id=363c946b36a77aa6f0e60b8c93a171d2e649164f but I don't yet understand what's wrong with that commit, if anything. I'm also surprised to see this code being run on Hydra during an evaluation. Mark