From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ricardo Wurmus Subject: bug#35551: package gcc does not depend on binutils and glibc Date: Fri, 10 May 2019 08:18:11 +0200 Message-ID: <87mujusuho.fsf@elephly.net> References: <1666426.mZ6LCf6Yd0@omega> <87y33i2qv6.fsf@gnu.org> <87pnors4r3.fsf@elephly.net> <2986777.FnrGXkQkEc@omega> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:41390) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hOyt2-0007NL-6H for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 10 May 2019 02:20:05 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hOyt1-0003cp-7q for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 10 May 2019 02:20:04 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:51648) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hOyt0-0003cb-UE for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 10 May 2019 02:20:03 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hOyt0-0006P9-Io for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 10 May 2019 02:20:02 -0400 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: In-reply-to: <2986777.FnrGXkQkEc@omega> List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: Bruno Haible Cc: 35551-done@debbugs.gnu.org Hi Bruno, >> > Ricardo, I think you had a patch to hide the =E2=80=98gcc=E2=80=99 pac= kage. Could you >> > commit it? >>=20 >> I=E2=80=99ve just done this. My apologies for the delay. Now a search = for >> =E2=80=9Cgcc=E2=80=9D only returns =E2=80=9Cgcc-toolchain=E2=80=9D (and = one =E2=80=9Cgcc-bootstrap=E2=80=9D). > > Will it also be hidden from the package list > https://www.gnu.org/software/guix/packages/G/ ? It should disappear from the list when it is regenerated, i.e. with the next release. --=20 Ricardo