From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Mathieu Othacehe <m.othacehe@gmail.com>
Subject: bug#36402: installation error
Date: Thu, 05 Sep 2019 15:53:22 +0200
Message-ID: <87mufiq27h.fsf@gmail.com>
References: <wWdteTLTUnxVX5pRpeceVgWYy_OZ39lObX0cx9myYTbL9YOVOv3zJ7Mj6kXszbwI5-IxhGglrmg-gIuEtzMGefejvXedlqOLDf04AIW4HB8=@protonmail.com>
 <87lfxmu47j.fsf@gnu.org> <878sr989br.fsf@gmail.com> <87a7bnaj0b.fsf@gnu.org>
 <87imqbgh71.fsf@gmail.com> <87woepyc7d.fsf@gnu.org>
 <87imq8tf88.fsf@gmail.com> <87pnkfi1nx.fsf@gnu.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:51804)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1i5sD5-0002cG-6w
 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Sep 2019 09:54:04 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1i5sD4-0008CL-96
 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Sep 2019 09:54:03 -0400
Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:54362)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)
 (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>)
 id 1i5sD4-0008CE-5K
 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Sep 2019 09:54:02 -0400
Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1i5sD4-0006NM-2I
 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Sep 2019 09:54:02 -0400
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.36402.B36402.156769161524476@debbugs.gnu.org>
In-reply-to: <87pnkfi1nx.fsf@gnu.org>
List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix <bug-guix.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/bug-guix>,
 <mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-guix>
List-Post: <mailto:bug-guix@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-guix>,
 <mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "bug-Guix" <bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@gnu.org>
Cc: 36402@debbugs.gnu.org, Juan <r5jm@protonmail.com>


Hey,

> So perhaps you should define your own =E2=80=98define-wrapped-type=E2=80=
=99 macro that
> does =E2=80=98define-record-type=E2=80=99 + the weak hash table thing, an=
d replace all
> =E2=80=98define-record-type=E2=80=99 instances in structs.scm with
> =E2=80=98define-wrapped-type=E2=80=99.  How does that sound?

Seems like the right thing to do :) However, I had a look to all Parted
functions which result is passed to a pointer->X! function, and except
ped_device_get, they always return newly allocated objects. So I guess
we are safe for now.

Thanks,

Mathieu