From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Guillaume Le Vaillant <glv@posteo.net>
Subject: bug#40652: #36924 way solves the problem for me
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2020 11:24:38 +0200
Message-ID: <87mu7bye95.fsf@yamatai>
References: <20200416002020.GA381@tulip> <20200416053137.GA787@tulip>
 <87pnc7yjgd.fsf@yamatai> <877dyfkegp.fsf@gnu.org> <87o8rryfih.fsf@yamatai>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";
 micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Return-path: <bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:51967)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1jP0lb-0008CT-ET
 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 05:25:04 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1jP0la-0001mV-CT
 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 05:25:03 -0400
Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:54239)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)
 (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>)
 id 1jP0la-0001mR-AC
 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 05:25:02 -0400
Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1jP0la-00047w-6a
 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 05:25:02 -0400
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.40652.B40652.158702908915843@debbugs.gnu.org>
In-reply-to: <87o8rryfih.fsf@yamatai>
List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix <bug-guix.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/bug-guix>,
 <mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-guix>
List-Post: <mailto:bug-guix@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-guix>,
 <mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org
Sender: "bug-Guix" <bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@gnu.org>
Cc: 40652@debbugs.gnu.org

--=-=-=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


Guillaume Le Vaillant <glv@posteo.net> skribis:

> Ludovic Court=C3=A8s <ludo@gnu.org> skribis:
>
>> Hi Guillaume,
>>
>> Guillaume Le Vaillant <glv@posteo.net> skribis:
>>
>>> I don't know if it's related, but recently I had GDM crashes at boot
>>> after reconfiguring a system using gdm-service-type (generation n) to
>>> make it use slim-service-type instead (generation n+1), and then
>>> reconfiguring to gdm-service-type again (generation n+2).
>>>
>>> The problem was that the 'gdm' user id number (or group id number) was
>>> not the same in generations n and n+2, which prevented GDM from
>>> accessing the '/var/lib/gdm' directory.
>>
>> When did that happen?
>>
>> Commit a43e9157ef479e94c19951cc9d228cf153bf78ee (Sep. 2019) supposedly
>> ensures that /var/lib/gdm has proper ownership.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Ludo=E2=80=99.
>
> I think it was around 2 weeks ago.

Concerning the service extensions of gdm-service-type, is it guaranteed
that %gdm-activation will be run after %gdm-accounts and not before?
If it's not the case it could explain the problem...

--=-=-=
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iHUEARYKAB0WIQQkUwKxurH4Z/3KlryPP4Yfgut6mgUCXpgkVgAKCRCPP4Yfgut6
mh8HAQDcTyzfd0U8WgSDd3se3QirTUntpe2rlbo/z9LT9QHvQgEAh3SZrg1jOHuF
cnQr+OBFCcWE/Ttqvcs7KQo99OF8SQ8=
=AA+U
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-=-=--