From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id oGfvMObwrV6+cAAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Sat, 02 May 2020 22:15:02 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1 with LMTPS id WCPsEPHwrV63TAAAbx9fmQ (envelope-from ) for ; Sat, 02 May 2020 22:15:13 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [IPv6:2001:470:142::17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6B2889409E7 for ; Sat, 2 May 2020 22:15:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:36798 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jV0Pf-00066D-KQ for larch@yhetil.org; Sat, 02 May 2020 18:15:11 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:42386) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jV0PW-00061v-Ku for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 02 May 2020 18:15:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jV0PW-0007KH-5X for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 02 May 2020 18:15:02 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:42534) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jV0PV-0007IQ-Ml for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 02 May 2020 18:15:01 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jV0PV-0008Sy-I9 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 02 May 2020 18:15:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#40977: --load-path does not honor ~ Resent-From: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 02 May 2020 22:15:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 40977 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: notabug To: zimoun Received: via spool by 40977-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B40977.158845768232497 (code B ref 40977); Sat, 02 May 2020 22:15:01 +0000 Received: (at 40977) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 May 2020 22:14:42 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54080 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jV0PC-0008S5-FE for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 02 May 2020 18:14:42 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:39282) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jV0PB-0008Rs-MR for 40977@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 02 May 2020 18:14:41 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:40585) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jV0P5-0006mU-BD; Sat, 02 May 2020 18:14:35 -0400 Received: from [2a01:e0a:1d:7270:af76:b9b:ca24:c465] (port=48456 helo=ribbon) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1jV0P4-0007HD-Ps; Sat, 02 May 2020 18:14:35 -0400 From: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= References: <9fc5fc35-10c6-dda3-1e11-36740e4510c4@crazy-compilers.com> <52117c4b-3090-1ccf-5669-ff4c47935e19@crazy-compilers.com> <20200430193439.0db54d2f@scratchpost.org> <87k11u8oo6.fsf@gnu.org> X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: 15 =?UTF-8?Q?Flor=C3=A9al?= an 228 de la =?UTF-8?Q?R=C3=A9volution?= X-PGP-Key-ID: 0x090B11993D9AEBB5 X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 3CE4 6455 8A84 FDC6 9DB4 0CFB 090B 1199 3D9A EBB5 X-OS: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu Date: Sun, 03 May 2020 00:14:33 +0200 In-Reply-To: (zimoun's message of "Sat, 2 May 2020 15:55:00 +0200") Message-ID: <87mu6q2ddi.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-guix@gnu.org List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: 40977@debbugs.gnu.org, Hartmut Goebel Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" X-Scanner: scn0 X-Spam-Score: 1.05 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org designates 2001:470:142::17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org X-Scan-Result: default: False [1.05 / 13.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; GENERIC_REPUTATION(0.00)[-0.4949107443744]; MX_INVALID(1.00)[cached]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2001:470:142::/48:c]; IP_REPUTATION_HAM(0.00)[asn: 22989(0.15), country: US(-0.00), ip: 2001:470:142::17(-0.49)]; DWL_DNSWL_BLOCKED(0.00)[2001:470:142::17:from]; MAILLIST(-0.20)[mailman]; FREEMAIL_TO(0.00)[gmail.com]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_FAIL(0.00)[2001:470:142::17:server fail]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; R_MIXED_CHARSET(0.56)[subject]; ASN(0.00)[asn:22989, ipnet:2001:470:142::/48, country:US]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; TAGGED_FROM(0.00)[larch=yhetil.org]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; FORGED_RECIPIENTS_MAILLIST(0.00)[]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[ludo@gnu.org,bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; URIBL_BLOCKED(0.00)[gnu.org:email]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; TAGGED_RCPT(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[gnu.org]; HAS_LIST_UNSUB(-0.01)[]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_SEVEN(0.00)[10]; FORGED_SENDER_MAILLIST(0.00)[] X-TUID: JukIaESvAnzZ zimoun skribis: > On Sat, 2 May 2020 at 15:14, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote: > >> It=E2=80=99s admittedly annoying, but it=E2=80=99s not something Guix it= self should >> paper over. Doing that would open a can of worms, as illustrated by the >> example Tobias gave. > > Instead of 'notabug' , I propose to tag this bug as 'wontfix' and > retitle it as: "Tilde-expansion in --long-options=3D". > > Is it ok? Sure. Ludo=E2=80=99.