From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp0 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id GKoSDT/hT18TcwAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 02 Sep 2020 18:15:27 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp0 with LMTPS id MBruCD/hT1/2FQAA1q6Kng (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 02 Sep 2020 18:15:27 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EC020940366 for ; Wed, 2 Sep 2020 18:15:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:60944 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kDXI4-0005up-QT for larch@yhetil.org; Wed, 02 Sep 2020 14:15:24 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:35210) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kDXHi-0005uL-TM for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Sep 2020 14:15:02 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:49119) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kDXHi-0001KP-Ii for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Sep 2020 14:15:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kDXHi-0005jp-Ds for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Sep 2020 14:15:02 -0400 Subject: bug#43112: hedgewars 1.0.0 fails to build Resent-From: Timothy Sample Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-To: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 02 Sep 2020 18:15:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: cc-closed 43112 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Andreas Enge Mail-Followup-To: 43112@debbugs.gnu.org, samplet@ngyro.com, bdju@tilde.team Received: via spool by 43112-done@debbugs.gnu.org id=D43112.159907045121971 (code D ref 43112); Wed, 02 Sep 2020 18:15:02 +0000 Received: (at 43112-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Sep 2020 18:14:11 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60664 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kDXGs-0005iJ-LL for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 02 Sep 2020 14:14:11 -0400 Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.25]:46829) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kDXGq-0005i6-OQ for 43112-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 02 Sep 2020 14:14:09 -0400 Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6E8D5C0067; Wed, 2 Sep 2020 14:14:03 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 02 Sep 2020 14:14:03 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=RY9kaUnxyE0hClallsACGyAW+9vPvsE9o1WoJtoUI SU=; b=VQdL3RttNxUAkAmdBGu2b2c9/Bw2CzzFZ7RVmU73qaVhZDwVfnAkLEIab rfs93QyLvAW3JQenwfsxUVivyaRqEChwXp5MFRkN0ZBa5vf0dmaJZY/qmruMxuLV 1NsFTW6Exn0AWacSrBb2J9O0JpcrFUF3OQ3paIDRmXYqmUiF1+5MFx/b7ZPl9myb tqzOuj1hVvZpYq1/jZzpmSzINjAoF7xGppHzgdYxvFTBuhc8uJW/l5BF+UqW1EEW dHoU54uCM9Po0UXBubP0azivN+8ESdEDhMqhYiiQjfX6g/pMtESz0qIQ4766tYY7 r07X5sw90O9J5QW0n67mt1rgGIYEA== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduiedrudefledguddvvdcutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfgh necuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmd enogfuuhhsphgvtghtffhomhgrihhnucdlgeelmdenucfjughrpefhvffufhffjgfkfggg tgfgsehtqhertddtreejnecuhfhrohhmpefvihhmohhthhihucfurghmphhlvgcuoehsrg hmphhlvghtsehnghihrhhordgtohhmqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpedvgfeuvddtfeeu teduveevvdetieelhfduleeuleeihfeuffethefhfeevtdfhudenucffohhmrghinhepih igrdhiohenucfkphepjeegrdduudeirddukeeirdeggeenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigv pedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehsrghmphhlvghtsehnghihrhhordgtoh hm X-ME-Proxy: Received: from mrblack (74-116-186-44.qc.dsl.ebox.net [74.116.186.44]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id E643B306005F; Wed, 2 Sep 2020 14:14:02 -0400 (EDT) From: Timothy Sample References: <20200901164239.GA9977@jurong> Date: Wed, 02 Sep 2020 14:13:06 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20200901164239.GA9977@jurong> (Andreas Enge's message of "Tue, 1 Sep 2020 18:42:39 +0200") Message-ID: <87mu28caj1.fsf@ngyro.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) X-BeenThere: bug-guix@gnu.org List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: 43112-done@debbugs.gnu.org, bdju Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" X-Scanner: scn0 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail (rsa verify failed) header.d=messagingengine.com header.s=fm3 header.b=VQdL3Rtt; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -0.01 X-TUID: 1Xs7f0GbowbW Hi, Andreas Enge writes: > On Sun, Aug 30, 2020 at 01:23:37PM +0000, bdju via Bug reports for GNU > Guix wrote: >> build log here: >> http://ix.io/2vGD >>=20 >> running guix (GNU Guix) a6b72a0f2b02f27c44c28d32ec26fc8188ee61b8 > > [...] > > This does not make much sense to me - it simply looks like a list of > ghc packages; the first one, ghc-regex-tdfa@1.2.3.2 is already an input, > the second one not. Someone who knows ghc should take over... We recently switched to using shared libraries, which means that GHC requires some extra flags to do the right thing. Fixed in f14e808aeae7b2fa7536f5fe62dae66b788fea84. I tried running the game and the server, and they seem to work. If there are any new runtime issues, don=E2=80=99t hesitate to send another bug report. -- Tim