From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=)
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Implement guix-package --upgrade
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2013 22:42:30 +0100
Message-ID: <87liatp5tl.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <87vc9yxcre.fsf@tines.lan> <8738x1xrek.fsf@tines.lan>
	<87vc9xqpd6.fsf@tines.lan> <201302122204.54359.andreas@enge.fr>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:59847)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1U5Nch-0003mO-Hq
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Feb 2013 16:42:45 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1U5Nce-0004xT-Lr
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Feb 2013 16:42:43 -0500
Received: from [2a01:e0b:1:123:ca0a:a9ff:fe03:271e] (port=57174
	helo=xanadu.aquilenet.fr) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1U5Nce-0004wf-FB
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Feb 2013 16:42:40 -0500
In-Reply-To: <201302122204.54359.andreas@enge.fr> (Andreas Enge's message of
	"Tue, 12 Feb 2013 22:04:54 +0100")
List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix <bug-guix.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/bug-guix>,
	<mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-guix>
List-Post: <mailto:bug-guix@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-guix>,
	<mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Andreas Enge <andreas@enge.fr>
Cc: bug-guix@gnu.org

Andreas Enge <andreas@enge.fr> skribis:

> Am Dienstag, 12. Februar 2013 schrieb Mark H Weaver:
>> For now, I'm going to assume that "guix-package -i guile" indeed
>> *should* choose from among the newest available versions, so I'm going
>> to work on fixing that.
>
> Yes, that was exactly my point with libjpeg - we would like 9 to be=20
> installed by default instead of 8d.

Yes, agreed.

Ludo=E2=80=99.