From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Subject: bug#22020: Guile-SDL 0.5.2 test failure i686-linux-gnu Date: Fri, 05 Feb 2016 14:13:04 +0100 Message-ID: <87lh6zl2qn.fsf@gnu.org> References: <1448577083.28162.7.camel@openmailbox.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=-=-=" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:44577) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aRgD9-00088z-Cu for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Feb 2016 08:14:08 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aRgD4-0001B7-CG for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Feb 2016 08:14:07 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:52555) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aRgD4-0001B3-8l for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Feb 2016 08:14:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aRgD4-0004zC-4t for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Feb 2016 08:14:02 -0500 In-Reply-To: <1448577083.28162.7.camel@openmailbox.org> Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: bug-guile-sdl@gnu.org Cc: 22020@debbugs.gnu.org --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi! I=E2=80=99m not seeing the message below at , so resending it. (This is from .) Ludo=E2=80=99. --=-=-= Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline X-From-Line: unknown Fri Feb 05 08:09:19 2016 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#22020: Guile-SDL 0.5.2 test failure i686-linux-gnu Resent-From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2015 11:51:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 22020 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: bug-guile-sdl@gnu.org, 22020@debbugs.gnu.org Cc: 22020@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 22020-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B22020.144879782929926 (code B ref 22020); Sun, 29 Nov 2015 11:51:02 +0000 Received: (at 22020) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 Nov 2015 11:50:29 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58806 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1a30Uv-0007mb-3U for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 29 Nov 2015 06:50:29 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:49366) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1a30UZ-0007m6-Uc for 22020@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 29 Nov 2015 06:50:26 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a30UU-0007B4-HE for 22020@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 29 Nov 2015 06:50:07 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:51956) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a30UU-0007Aw-Er; Sun, 29 Nov 2015 06:50:02 -0500 Received: from reverse-83.fdn.fr ([80.67.176.83]:51244 helo=pluto) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1a30UT-0006iv-J6; Sun, 29 Nov 2015 06:50:02 -0500 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) References: <1448577083.28162.7.camel@openmailbox.org> Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2015 12:49:59 +0100 In-Reply-To: <1448577083.28162.7.camel@openmailbox.org> ("Luis Felipe =?utf-8?Q?L=C3=B3pez?= Acevedo"'s message of "Thu, 26 Nov 2015 17:31:23 -0500") Message-ID: <874mg5m3dk.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello! On GNU Guix, we=E2=80=99re seeing one 100% reproducible test failure on i686-linux-gnu: --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- /gnu/store/isxqjfaglyfsbcv75y8qbqbph8v28ykr-bash-4.3.39/bin/bash: line 5: = 838 Segmentation fault (core dumped) HAVE_TTF=3D1 HAVE_MIXER=3D0 sh z= ow ${dir}$tst FAIL: gfx.scm _FontTransOpen: Unable to Parse address ${prefix}/share/fonts/X11/misc/ _FontTransOpen: Unable to Parse address ${prefix}/share/fonts/X11/TTF/ _FontTransOpen: Unable to Parse address ${prefix}/share/fonts/X11/OTF/ _FontTransOpen: Unable to Parse address ${prefix}/share/fonts/X11/Type1/ _FontTransOpen: Unable to Parse address ${prefix}/share/fonts/X11/100dpi/ _FontTransOpen: Unable to Parse address ${prefix}/share/fonts/X11/75dpi/ _FontTransOpen: Unable to Parse address ${prefix}/share/fonts/X11/misc/ _FontTransOpen: Unable to Parse address ${prefix}/share/fonts/X11/TTF/ _FontTransOpen: Unable to Parse address ${prefix}/share/fonts/X11/OTF/ _FontTransOpen: Unable to Parse address ${prefix}/share/fonts/X11/Type1/ _FontTransOpen: Unable to Parse address ${prefix}/share/fonts/X11/100dpi/ _FontTransOpen: Unable to Parse address ${prefix}/share/fonts/X11/75dpi/ PASS: fading.scm =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D 1 of 9 tests failed (2 tests were not run) Please report to bug-guile-sdl@gnu.org =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- (Note that we run tests with the Xvfb server. See .) The backtrace is mildly informative: --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- $ gdb $(type -P guile) core GNU gdb (GDB) 7.10 [...] (gdb) bt #0 0xf4d98130 in SDL_imageFilterSubByteMMX (Src1=3D0x5d , Dest=3D0xffb429c8 "]",=20 SrcLength=3D4107944472, C=3D152 '\230') at SDL_imageFilter.c:2185 #1 0x09cfd470 in ?? () Backtrace stopped: previous frame inner to this frame (corrupt stack?) --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- That SrcLength is so high suggests it might be an integer overflow. This is with SDL_image 1.2.12. To reproduce with Guix, run: guix build guile-sdl -s i686-linux --keep-failed Thanks, Ludo=E2=80=99. --=-=-=--