From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Subject: bug#29086: Fwd: Serious regression in Qt 5.9.2 regarding kirigami Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2017 22:04:19 +0100 Message-ID: <87lgiv8k30.fsf@gnu.org> References: <4309126.CVTvT5sbHh@phobos> <873753a8on.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52603) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eIL9n-0002yj-0k for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 24 Nov 2017 16:05:08 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eIL9i-00031t-Sf for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 24 Nov 2017 16:05:07 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:47781) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eIL9i-00031i-Q9 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 24 Nov 2017 16:05:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eIL9i-0005gS-IX for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 24 Nov 2017 16:05:02 -0500 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-To: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <873753a8on.fsf@gnu.org> ("Ludovic \=\?utf-8\?Q\?Court\=C3\=A8s\=22'\?\= \=\?utf-8\?Q\?s\?\= message of "Fri, 24 Nov 2017 18:27:36 +0100") List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: Hartmut Goebel Cc: 29086-done@debbugs.gnu.org Hi, ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Court=C3=A8s) skribis: > Hartmut Goebel skribis: > >> The recent Qt 5.9.2 release, introduces a pretty serious bug which >> prevents some kirigami applications to start at all. >> It is described there: >> https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-64017 >> >> reverting the commit 98358715930739ca8de172d88c5ce6941c275ff3 in >> qtdeclarative seems to fix the problem, so for distributions i recomend >> to either patch it out or wait on 5.9.2 packaging for now > > Can you suggest a way forward, perhaps simply applying the revert above > on our side? Efraim pushed an upgrade to 5.9.3 earlier today. Problem solved! :-) https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git/log/?showmsg=3D1 Ludo=E2=80=99.