From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Jan Nieuwenhuizen <janneke@gnu.org>
Subject: bug#32749: package-with-explicit-inputs leaks-in additional inputs
Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2018 17:59:54 +0200
Message-ID: <87lg803yit.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <87tvmo4f1d.fsf@gnu.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56006)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1g1vxP-0004UZ-GY
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Sep 2018 12:01:04 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1g1vxO-0006vz-Jv
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Sep 2018 12:01:03 -0400
Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:39030)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)
	(Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1g1vxO-0006vf-Eo
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Sep 2018 12:01:02 -0400
Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1g1vxO-0007zu-Bj
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Sep 2018 12:01:02 -0400
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.32749.B32749.153720001030668@debbugs.gnu.org>
In-Reply-To: <87tvmo4f1d.fsf@gnu.org> (Jan Nieuwenhuizen's message of "Mon, 17
	Sep 2018 12:03:10 +0200")
List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix <bug-guix.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/bug-guix>,
	<mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-guix/>
List-Post: <mailto:bug-guix@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-guix>,
	<mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "bug-Guix" <bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: 32749@debbugs.gnu.org

Jan Nieuwenhuizen writes:

> Should `package-with-explicit-inputs' behave like I think it does, i.e.,
> should both test packages list the same dependencies, or am I missing
> something?

Printing the packages in the Guix Repl gives this result

--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
(package-inputs gnu-make-no-implicit-inputs)
$12 = (("libc" #<package glibc-bootstrap@0 gnu/packages/bootstrap.scm:150 3f39cc0>) ("gcc" #<package gcc-bootstrap@0 gnu/packages/bootstrap.scm:150 3f39c00>) ("binutils" #<package binutils-bootstrap@0 gnu/packages/bootstrap.scm:150 3f39b40>) ("coreutils&co" #<package bootstrap-binaries@0 gnu/packages/bootstrap.scm:150 3f39a80>) ("bash" #<package bootstrap-binaries@0 gnu/packages/bootstrap.scm:150 3f39a80>))
scheme@(gnu packages pawei)> (map car (package-inputs gnu-make-no-implicit-inputs))
$13 = ("libc" "gcc" "binutils" "coreutils&co" "bash")
scheme@(gnu packages pawei)> (package-native-inputs gnu-make-no-implicit-inputs)
$14 = ()
scheme@(gnu packages pawei)> (package-propagated-inputs gnu-make-no-implicit-inputs)
$15 = ()
scheme@(gnu packages pawei)> (package-inputs gnu-make-explicit-inputs)
$16 = (("libc" #<package glibc-bootstrap@0 gnu/packages/bootstrap.scm:150 3f39cc0>) ("gcc" #<package gcc-bootstrap@0 gnu/packages/bootstrap.scm:150 3f39c00>) ("binutils" #<package binutils-bootstrap@0 gnu/packages/bootstrap.scm:150 3f39b40>) ("coreutils&co" #<package bootstrap-binaries@0 gnu/packages/bootstrap.scm:150 3f39a80>) ("bash" #<package bootstrap-binaries@0 gnu/packages/bootstrap.scm:150 3f39a80>) ("guile" #<package guile@2.0.14 gnu/packages/bootstrap.scm:150 3f39900>))
scheme@(gnu packages pawei)> 
$17 = (("pkg-config" #<package pkg-config@0.29.2 gnu/packages/bootstrap.scm:150 3f39780>))
scheme@(gnu packages pawei)> (package-propagated-inputs gnu-make-explicit-inputs)
$18 = ()
scheme@(gnu packages pawei)> (package-native-inputs gnu-make-explicit-inputs)
$19 = (("pkg-config" #<package pkg-config@0.29.2 gnu/packages/bootstrap.scm:150 3f39780>))
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

which is exactly what I expect to see when I read the Guile code for the
package descriptions; but is still a bit surprising to me: where do all
the extra inputs come from in the graph?

janneke