From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark H Weaver Subject: bug#33768: guix 0.16.0-4.60b0402 fails tests on aarch64 Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2018 17:05:56 -0500 Message-ID: <87lg4mjxr4.fsf@netris.org> References: <87imztr601.fsf@ponder.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <20181216211208.5e86b797@scratchpost.org> <20181217073124.GH3468@macbook41> <87bm5ihm16.fsf@ponder.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45882) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gZNXF-0003eq-BO for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Dec 2018 17:08:20 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gZNX3-0007XM-RS for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Dec 2018 17:08:11 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:49566) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gZNX0-0007U3-GA for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Dec 2018 17:08:03 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gZNX0-0006ym-9J for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Dec 2018 17:08:02 -0500 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <87bm5ihm16.fsf@ponder.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> (Vagrant Cascadian's message of "Tue, 18 Dec 2018 07:50:13 -0800") List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: Vagrant Cascadian Cc: 33768@debbugs.gnu.org Vagrant Cascadian writes: > On 2018-12-17, Efraim Flashner wrote: >> On Sun, Dec 16, 2018 at 09:12:08PM +0100, Danny Milosavljevic wrote: >>> Should be fixed on master. Can you confirm? >> >> Vagrant confirmed on IRC that it is fixed on master. > > I think that was a different bug. > > As of 2119cd3a350cb5544418a0e8ac6c7fb6dcbf0a13 it still wasn't fixed; I > haven't checked more recently. If I'm not mistaken, although the bug is fixed on our 'master' branch, the problem is that our 'guix' package still uses an older commit from before the bug was fixed. Now we need to update our 'guix' package. See also . Mark