From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Subject: bug#26752: Ansible & others' problems with wrapped '.ansible-real' scripts Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2019 23:14:04 +0100 Message-ID: <87lg2s5zv7.fsf@gnu.org> References: <874lx2w926.fsf@gnu.org> <8760fnsv3u.fsf@gnu.org> <87tvhkhu15.fsf@elephly.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:38496) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1grVTD-0006IB-Ah for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Feb 2019 17:15:04 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1grVTC-0003IQ-Cp for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Feb 2019 17:15:03 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:37006) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1grVTC-0003IL-9W for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Feb 2019 17:15:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1grVTC-0001XL-4I for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Feb 2019 17:15:02 -0500 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <87tvhkhu15.fsf@elephly.net> (Ricardo Wurmus's message of "Mon, 04 Feb 2019 08:50:14 +0100") List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: Ricardo Wurmus Cc: Jelle Licht , 26752@debbugs.gnu.org, 29951@debbugs.gnu.org Ricardo Wurmus skribis: > ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Court=C3=A8s) writes: >> Jelle Licht skribis: >> >>> The current ansible package is still brokenin the same way. >>> >>> Is there already an acceptable way of working around this problem? >>> Otherwise I could send my (extremely hacky) workaround that adds a spec= ific >>> condition in the ansible source code to check for .ansible-real. >> >> For now I think we have to go with the hack. Make sure to add a comment >> linking to this bug report. > > There is a way to get around this. It=E2=80=99s presented in #29951: > > https://issues.guix.info/issue/29951 BTW, there=E2=80=99s also this patch series on this topic: https://issues.guix.info/issue/27003 What to do? Ludo=E2=80=99.