From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Mark H Weaver <mhw@netris.org>
Subject: bug#36747: Official MesCC bootstrap binaries differ from my locally
 built ones
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2019 01:42:25 -0400
Message-ID: <87lfwpqpb7.fsf@netris.org>
References: <875znwcoo9.fsf@netris.org> <87ef2j1pgt.fsf@gnu.org>
 <87ftmy51kk.fsf@netris.org> <87muh6sib4.fsf@gnu.org>
 <877e8a79mz.fsf@netris.org> <87pnm2ufv1.fsf@gnu.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:45076)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1hpnbk-0007TF-2B
 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 23 Jul 2019 01:45:05 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1hpnbi-0006gm-OW
 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 23 Jul 2019 01:45:03 -0400
Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:53289)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)
 (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>)
 id 1hpnbi-0006gE-Jv
 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 23 Jul 2019 01:45:02 -0400
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.36747.B36747.15638606894585@debbugs.gnu.org>
In-Reply-To: <87pnm2ufv1.fsf@gnu.org>
List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix <bug-guix.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/bug-guix>,
 <mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-guix>
List-Post: <mailto:bug-guix@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-guix>,
 <mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "bug-Guix" <bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Jan Nieuwenhuizen <janneke@gnu.org>
Cc: 36747@debbugs.gnu.org

Hi Janneke,

> I have added a very similar set of two patches to wip-cu-binaries,
> branched @ ef809e3ac036eccc5f9c9edd8fb661d14ae15f2f.
>
> They give the same md5sum for me as the wip-binaries branch that
> branched off of master; so mine are at
> http://lilypond.org/janneke/guix/20190722/

I built these, and here are the results:

--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
mhw@jojen /gnu/store/hd3lk0f08a0sq40qqa6yv1q9gbk7gxww-bootstrap-tarballs-0$ sha256sum *
b5915c71ff5ea722864e1097ce1e7ed50fd68ad7544521f2dd6969173c260276  guile-static-stripped-2.2.4-i686-linux.tar.xz
1acd8f83e27d2fac311a5ca78e9bf11a9a1638b82469870d5c854c4e7afaa26a  linux-libre-headers-stripped-4.14.67-i686-linux.tar.xz
021543d9bb6af55f39e68d69692e3cb74646ced2cad0bb9ac0047ef81e9d7330  mescc-tools-static-stripped-0.5.2-0.bb062b0-i686-linux.tar.xz
fb32090071b39fc804fb9a7fba96f0bc5eb844a0efd268fb24c42e6bfa959de0  mes-minimal-stripped-0.19-i686-linux.tar.xz
9ee954dc19db5c8d4113c73a702fd8f79f26c51024220f2617d0572c0a85e69c  static-binaries-0-i686-linux.tar.xz
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

Do these match what you built?

For the sake of completeness, I built these by running

  ./pre-inst-env guix build bootstrap-tarballs --system=i686-linux

from a git checkout at commit 5a6465e41a84b4320940d33709b80d78c1aff9d0.

> After this commit should come the update-commit, using them in
> bootstrap.scm.

Right, except those commits should be applied to the tip of
'core-updates', and not until we're sure that these new bootstrap
binaries are good.

Ludovic, what do you think?

     Thanks,
       Mark