From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: zerodaysfordays@sdf.lonestar.org (Jakob L. Kreuze) Subject: bug#36878: guix system reconfigure broken Date: Fri, 02 Aug 2019 11:11:31 -0400 Message-ID: <87lfwb1u1o.fsf__49014.7293474124$1564758928$gmane$org@sdf.lonestar.org> References: <87wofycfuq.fsf@sdf.lonestar.org> <0D1F3165-BE55-42D8-98D9-364CB4904A0E@vllmrt.net> <87k1bycbn8.fsf@sdf.lonestar.org> <871ry59dsw.fsf@sdf.lonestar.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:49234) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1htZGp-0008Ey-Ln for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 02 Aug 2019 11:15:06 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1htZGo-0004fr-PB for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 02 Aug 2019 11:15:03 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:48756) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1htZGo-0004fn-MY for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 02 Aug 2019 11:15:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1htZGo-0005Cp-Gy for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 02 Aug 2019 11:15:02 -0400 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <871ry59dsw.fsf@sdf.lonestar.org> (Jakob L. Kreuze's message of "Thu, 01 Aug 2019 10:10:39 -0400") List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: Robert Vollmert Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org, 36878@debbugs.gnu.org --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain zerodaysfordays@sdf.lonestar.org (Jakob L. Kreuze) writes: > Great :) > > CC'ing Chris and Dave since I don't have write access -- can we > fast-track #36880 into master? I'd consider this to be a high-priority > bug fix. > > Regards, > Jakob The patch made it into master as 1db6f137d; thanks to Danny for signing off on it. Should we close this? Regards, Jakob --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEa1VJLOiXAjQ2BGSm9Qb9Fp2P2VoFAl1EUqMACgkQ9Qb9Fp2P 2Vqg4Q//Va3vbKYtNK1jv7tOQNkws85gunXD4yooa+04QzHZrJDcbvLhverlCoqT R5oHhwyz65aqzINf5JbQhBcI/FKdMV548j0RPUjswXnr2IuQfIVEepjcUKJ3GLSv +fLIL8PDxHLPbOS16P7dBi6AVZjJ0zQdE4B2NR0RH7xRi3FijVOm/OgdhwmxVqxg 8ZLAX8Z39ChdxrN1oZrHl96efaM252PbKXV2m9RvteFU1RvXjM1S+ry3MxkMaUYf Xs8Kj1kgzeHJ/YbVwmyieZkC/rGd0OUHKaPVmhN+R0EjF4ls4qTPVDbm2nhesu26 Fchj7YK3ffY3Uzjmsik1zIigjlWl6mnc3aqS0E4IUips+DH9pxO9CNEMFHVvvCEt pl9oNI44jRhaCMEDk9iZdZ021aX1YBd8gn0lqwZvX981Psf3/bRdYaxGRl4cdY/p NTr1p1OlWLBjOtLtsq8fWPbC5qhNCaZkJBhnoZTRXex4KLyWYeXqzjh5hmYWaxSp sTDGJ3zT3HCNL+XW3377vyB1TVYZ/SEXcUtlG8KcVpjr0siOk+Ds4qVxn748096C zOMFLL5sXdPCIpYt2RcI7Y23/hOgYNxLSeDiJp6e2uqeefWJMNEPnoi3dARvqEBx vqMpMxeNA18iNbF9XMbljuWEUcYZAADZ+YYXGpfIpEOUj+V21wk= =RRGp -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--