From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark H Weaver Subject: bug#36938: Website: Package list is not updated Date: Tue, 06 Aug 2019 04:43:18 -0400 Message-ID: <87lfw6n0ou.fsf@netris.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:55513) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1huv4d-0002C3-UK for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Aug 2019 04:44:04 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1huv4c-0002Jz-UJ for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Aug 2019 04:44:03 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:55898) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1huv4c-0002Jc-Ry for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Aug 2019 04:44:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1huv4c-0007kq-Fo for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Aug 2019 04:44:02 -0400 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-To: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Message-ID: In-Reply-To: (Hartmut Goebel's message of "Mon, 5 Aug 2019 21:23:53 +0200") List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: Hartmut Goebel Cc: 36938-done@debbugs.gnu.org Hi, Hartmut Goebel writes: > The package list at http://guix.gnu.org/packages/ is not updated. It > still says: > > [=E2=80=A6] provides 9,789 packages [=E2=80=A6] (updated July 19, 2019). Indeed, and in fact the packages listed are much older than July 19. They are actually from late May. An easy way to check the actual age of the package list is to look at the linux-libre packages, which are usually updated at least once per week. As I write this, the listed version is 5.1.5, which means that the list of from somewhere between May 26 and June 1. We already have an open ticket for this issue, , so I'm closing this new ticket. See the existing bug for more details. Thanks, Mark