From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Subject: bug#37388: can lead to syntactically invalid configs Date: Sat, 14 Sep 2019 11:48:11 +0200 Message-ID: <87lfur5hus.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87d0g6q752.fsf@inria.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:43549) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1i94fu-0008BI-Rb for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 14 Sep 2019 05:49:03 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1i94ft-0005MM-TT for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 14 Sep 2019 05:49:02 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:37065) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1i94ft-0005MG-Qj for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 14 Sep 2019 05:49:01 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1i94ft-000248-NR for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 14 Sep 2019 05:49:01 -0400 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: In-Reply-To: ("=?UTF-8?Q?G=C3=A1bor?= Boskovits"'s message of "Thu, 12 Sep 2019 14:49:10 +0200") List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: =?UTF-8?Q?G=C3=A1bor?= Boskovits Cc: 37388@debbugs.gnu.org Hi G=C3=A1bor, G=C3=A1bor Boskovits skribis: > I would like to add some more information to this, which I encountered wh= en > trying to find a solution to the last-modified issue: > > 1. the nginx configuration can only be extended using server blocks, so it > is not possible to inject a location or a nested location. > 2. the meaning of the nginx configuration can dependent on the order of > directives in the configuration. Either we should give > and explicit mechanism for dealing with that, or disallow such > configurations. > > If you feel these points to be off topic, then I can open a separate bug > for that, but these seem to relate to the confgiuration mechanism, > and should be considered when designing the new interface. Wdyt? I think it would deserve a separate issue, but I agree that extension of is tricky due to ordering. Thanks for your feedback, Ludo=E2=80=99.