From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Chris Marusich Subject: bug#36634: Virtual Machine Manager (virt-manager) Date: Fri, 04 Oct 2019 22:41:54 -0700 Message-ID: <87lftzd9zx.fsf@gmail.com> References: <255adc32694ef0c22fb789b1eea66a243cffb649.camel@disroot.org> <87sgqze1yq.fsf@cbaines.net> <87wodzir88.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:46457) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iGcqN-0004TT-2I for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 05 Oct 2019 01:43:04 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iGcqM-0004IM-2M for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 05 Oct 2019 01:43:03 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:34795) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iGcqL-0004I8-TE for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 05 Oct 2019 01:43:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iGcqL-0007B9-P4 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 05 Oct 2019 01:43:01 -0400 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <87wodzir88.fsf@gmail.com> (Chris Marusich's message of "Sun, 22 Sep 2019 21:14:31 -0700") List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: Christopher Baines Cc: 36634@debbugs.gnu.org, rvgn@disroot.org --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Chris Marusich writes: > This bug is consistently reproducible. I've found an upstream bug > report that is very similar to what we're seeing here, so I've left a > comment telling the libvirt maintainers that Guix is also seeing a > similar issue: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3D1751120 Upstream has made a patch, which supposedly fixes the issue on Fedora systems. However, I applied it to a local checkout of Guix and tested it, but it didn't fix the issue for me. Perhaps that upstream bug and this bug are slightly different? Anyway, I've updated the upstream bug report with information that hopefully will be useful to them. We'll see how it goes. =2D-=20 Chris --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEy/WXVcvn5+/vGD+x3UCaFdgiRp0FAl2YLSMACgkQ3UCaFdgi Rp0Zyw//TaGq4QqvsyWM5aL+VQSGEGwmBKEAF5Rorz67EaHTu46/1By2vtWgF7Pl eC9m3CzGdZ6pLVIF5A3GtSjLe5I+VHHJd90u6U+ifQIGTa1dh5ys+H+6T4Frieln N5HV+wnUMIKhKLUyurvJ7UXXRBT6JiWFKMUJJvgLTLEin3N3mn6+Y52MhOVkwLh4 DYgillqsgLcTXpeuHhgee/2FHjO4gVUX4v07MIT054kNbRUkPNhUaIGigiwbr9fC zp0zKMfc742E568e9KN8JfLm3SR9XqxWbfcdw0biWDlLZippexGFdREy59zbn8Sc 5j3pEwAI7lQ4VIYKVcu6ygah8cLcPasWR2O+B95wjoORsgmLmQjnrdRY95ERHTcT 4KNZrcQy3OOYhSeNxVXgHLy6icwn9j7GFm8ZwVm2YGlJ0SUddaDzHFwkZFJqmAHN /UpY8YKugF4mZ26o1/6LTDfRHL4Jx1Oo6Nc4cQRR1W6+xsxKDzFSU+jp545t7VU4 KyBAtvgfAPBsUMCWUbq7tDjyAI5J4OmOZrb/YRma/RYFFPAadRdWjOUl6lCxWidW aTyR8AeRDyb+ehNYQ2y/8XBxnwkYHbMgcxX4awG88nXQ72dlWjVNgKJoMJ4IjxhD 73OQfKciY4wjBpEI9oXTLqFyWuOZKwQbbcgH/1dfg9tJCCScbB0= =VNMQ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--