From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=)
Subject: bug#18033: Add support for 'search-path-specifications' referring to
	files
Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2014 16:02:20 +0200
Message-ID: <87k37dh05v.fsf_-_@gnu.org>
References: <1405449096-29230-1-git-send-email-jmd@gnu.org>
	<1405449096-29230-5-git-send-email-jmd@gnu.org>
	<87r41ml4nu.fsf@gnu.org> <20140715214338.GB16482@jocasta.intra>
	<87mwc9irnj.fsf@gnu.org> <20140716100854.GB21262@jocasta.intra>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50561)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1X7Pna-0005B2-Fb
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 16 Jul 2014 10:03:17 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1X7PnS-0006m4-1c
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 16 Jul 2014 10:03:10 -0400
Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:33167)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1X7PnR-0006lw-Vb
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 16 Jul 2014 10:03:01 -0400
Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1X7PnR-0000LB-PA
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 16 Jul 2014 10:03:01 -0400
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.18033.B.14055193751296@debbugs.gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:49871)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1X7Pmz-000571-M5
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 16 Jul 2014 10:02:39 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1X7Pms-0006TW-RX
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 16 Jul 2014 10:02:33 -0400
In-Reply-To: <20140716100854.GB21262@jocasta.intra> (John Darrington's message
	of "Wed, 16 Jul 2014 12:08:54 +0200")
List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix <bug-guix.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/bug-guix>,
	<mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-guix>
List-Post: <mailto:bug-guix@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-guix>,
	<mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: 18033@debbugs.gnu.org
Cc: John Darrington <jmd@gnu.org>

See use case below.

John Darrington <john@darrington.wattle.id.au> skribis:

> On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 11:23:12AM +0200, Ludovic Court??s wrote:
>      John Darrington <john@darrington.wattle.id.au> skribis:
>      
>      > On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 10:59:17PM +0200, Ludovic Court??s wrote:
>      
>      [...]
>      
>      >      The problem is that ???search-path-specification??? is meant for $PATH-like
>      >      variables that list directories, not files.
>      >
>      > That occurred to me too.  But what problems does it actually cause?
>      
>      That we can???t use it for $XML_CATALOG_FILES.
>      
>      >      So I see two solutions:
>      >      
>      >        1. Patch libxml2 so that it honors a new variable, say
>      >           $XML_CATALOG_DIRECTORIES, which would allow us to use
>      >           ???search-path-specification???.
>      >      
>      >        2. Augment support for search paths to allow file-based search paths.
>      >      
>      >      (2) may be best in the long run, but it has ramifications in different
>      >      places.
>      >      
>      >
>      > (1) seems like a good idea only if upstream can be persuaded to adopt it.
>      
>      Which is unlikely, given that it???s redundant with $XML_CATALOG_FILES.
>      
>      > What are the ramifications of (2) ?
>      
>      There are changes in the build tools, for instance ???search-path-as-list???
>      (used by ???set-path-environment-variable???, used in gnu-build-system.scm)
>      expects directories, not files.  And all this calls things
>      ???directories???.
>      
>      This is a change we could schedule for the next core-updates.
>
> This sounds like it is the most sensible solution. 
>
> J'