From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=)
Subject: bug#25205: Guix package is using the GuixSD logo instead of the Guix
	logo
Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2016 11:28:40 +0100
Message-ID: <87k2b0417r.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <001ff235e0edbcb0f5a6fa69356555c9@openmailbox.org>
	<87wpf1ayro.fsf@gnu.org> <87eg187v6t.fsf@gnu.org>
	<87lgvgtl23.fsf@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59683)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1cHplC-0004yg-2L
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Dec 2016 05:29:07 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1cHpl8-0004yz-Uy
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Dec 2016 05:29:06 -0500
Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:56442)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)
	(Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1cHpl8-0004yh-RF
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Dec 2016 05:29:02 -0500
Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1cHpl8-0000Vr-J0
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Dec 2016 05:29:02 -0500
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.25205.B25205.14818841351959@debbugs.gnu.org>
In-Reply-To: <87lgvgtl23.fsf@gmail.com> (Chris Marusich's message of "Thu, 15
	Dec 2016 23:00:52 -0800")
List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix <bug-guix.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/bug-guix>,
	<mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-guix/>
List-Post: <mailto:bug-guix@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-guix>,
	<mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "bug-Guix" <bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Chris Marusich <cmmarusich@gmail.com>
Cc: Luis Felipe =?UTF-8?Q?L=C3=B3pez?= Acevedo <felipe.lopez@openmailbox.org>, 25205@debbugs.gnu.org

Hi!

Chris Marusich <cmmarusich@gmail.com> skribis:

> Since the words "Guix" and "GuixSD" are already different, I don't think
> they need to come in a different color.  I do like the off-color "SD" in
> the "GuixSD" logo, though, since it emphasizes that it's still Guix.

Right.  I thought that having =E2=80=9CSD=E2=80=9D in light gray kind of ma=
kes the logo
usable for both Guix{,SD}.

(And I agree with the branding argument.)

I=E2=80=99d like to know what Felipe thinks of this since he=E2=80=99s the =
expert.  :-)

Cheers,
Ludo=E2=80=99.